Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
Lyle, which part of the model do you believe to be the cause of the hoax issues?
Well which models are the right ones for starters? Is it the first edition or the revision or the revision of the revision? Do you not question when "scientists" go back and change the data....to me that's not science, that's moving the goalposts in order to help your hypothesis.

Why would someone do that? Grant money....funding....if there is no problem, then nobody needs to be paid to solve the problem, and that is a problem for the people who depend on this money. Now people will of course say "oil companies, big gas, those guys have money invested in proving this wrong, what about them" ....how's it any different from the government trying to prove it right? Do you think the government has our best interests at heart on this issue?
Science is self correcting as more data becomes more available and in most cases just more accessible. Yes there have been cases of intentional bad data being entered, this is the case in anything that humans are involved in.

As for specific models, let's break it down...........do you believe the greenhouse effect is quantifiable as a mathematical model?

Start here for current views
NASA Estimates 'Liquid Assets' of World's Water Budget | NASA