The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

[SlimTrae]

Pac joined in on the presidential thread along with Mr.Big and Kirk -mentioning how the swing voters would try to be wooed with legalizing marijuana

i responded negatively with Rush Limbaugh quotes on being against it now for it-

walrus replied :Holy crap slim I thought you were full of doo doo

Then when speaking on Rush stated:
I see nothing hypocritical about what Rush said. He got strung out on pain killers. It happens very easily ..{I edited this..FOX style }

you ended the quote with this: Shoot, I actually have more respect for Rush now.

then I got double teamed with U and your conservative cohort with: OK, fair enough, so is the entire Democrat Party hypocritical when it comes to abortion, gay rights, and civil rights? They weren't ALWAYS for those things



my response:
I've already said my part on the Dems. You didn't say as a result of my Dem bashing posts: fair enough.

As I called them pathetic. You didnt point to repubs & ask me if they were (pathetic), so I thought I'd help U out!

I am responding with a question- why are the same two posters always stabbing dems and nursing repubs?

[SlimTrae]

Again I stated:

The agenda for 2016 has already been put in place: the election is merely an audition for the best puppet whom the money barons believe can convince Americans (that a leader in the White House still exists control)

[SlimTrae]

Hey! I see your'e logged on!

[SlimTrae]

this debate/disagreement we're in;
started because you claimed I took the EASY WAY OUT-

when I said I wasnt voting this election.."again

yet when I stated this back in april -here is how you responded


Glad to hear you've given up. That's the boat I'm in.
04-19-2015 12:03 AM
So it was okay in April for me to say I am not voting because both parties have been highjacked-

but today- it NOW makes me a closet liberal?

I didnt change my statement- you just changed your POV on my statement- that is why I called you out.

[SlimTrae]

04-17-2015 09:41 PM


Hillary Big K; is a political chameleon.
She IMO is the consummate lying politician.
On NAFTA? Her memoirs stated NAFTA would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that we were reaping the benefits. Around 2003 She replied, "I think that we have to enforce the trade rules that are inherent" in NAFTA.

Today, Clinton says "NAFTA has not lived up to its promises."
I also like how she once stated she waived a "yellow" flag. CBS has even done a piece called Hillary's NAFTA lies.

Her statement that she was under the cover of gunfire is now laughable. It showed how insincere she is as a person which adds on to her legion of haters she has rightfully earned. But she has supporters. How else did she win senator time again?





It seems the more Conservative pundits talk about her- the higher her approval rating goes.

And as far as being under her rule? I am of the mindset that there isn't a potus who has rule. They are ruled by someone else. Walker, Rubio, Bush and maybe even Rand Paul.. none of these individuals have an agenda of their own.
Lobbyists will descend up the nation and work over the senators and House Rep on what KIND of bills need to come outta the senate and make it to Congress.
While Hillary on the Dem's and whoever on the Repub will dance and shuck & jive to the money barons on being their voice.