Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather

[bzkfn]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

[VG_Addict]

Khan said that "the legitimacy of your opponents is what matters".

Oh, you mean like ancient Collazo, ancient Barrera, ancient Diaz, Alexander who had already lost to Porter and Bradley, and had gifts over Matthysse and Kotelnik, and Algieri, who got floored six times by Pacquiao?

Floyd's resume absolutely SHITS on Khan's.

[Beanflicker]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

Nice!

So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.

I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.

[Master]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

Nice!

So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.

I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

[Beanflicker]

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.

[Primo Carnera]

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.

Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so. And although I'm not in the States, I don't believe he's really that highly thought of there either.
I did say a long time ago, Khan isn't going to get the Mayweather fight , so he might as well just abuse Mayweather at every opportunity, and it might just get in people's heads.
But his character assassination has started way too late, and now he just looks like a whinging twat!
Khan doesn't really believe any of this shit and he's a cock really. Deep down , Khan is now worried about who he fights next, because he can't keep avoiding punchers and top fighters in the division. Exactly who will he fight?

[VG_Addict]

What really bugs me about Khan is that he keeps insisting that he's a big draw, and on Floyd and Manny's level, in spite of OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.

[C.J.Rock]

What really bugs me about Khan is that he keeps insisting that he's a big draw, and on Floyd and Manny's level, in spite of OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.

Any good boxer could have the bogus undefeated record Mayweather has IF! they had NSAC/Vegas 100% behind them like Floyd has had

[Beanflicker]

Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so.

Bigger than Kel Brook and Keith Thurman? Of course he does, how could anyone argue that?

Dude has 1.6 million Twitter followers.

[Primo Carnera]

Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so.

Bigger than Kel Brook and Keith Thurman? Of course he does, how could anyone argue that?

Dude has 1.6 million Twitter followers.

Yeah, didn't he "buy" all those followers so that he could rig the Khan/Maidana vote off? And even that never worked.
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK, nobody talks about him with any respect in the US, and the only person who regularly talks about Khan is.... KHAN!

[nuggetdotcom]

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.

Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so. And although I'm not in the States, I don't believe he's really that highly thought of there either.
I did say a long time ago, Khan isn't going to get the Mayweather fight , so he might as well just abuse Mayweather at every opportunity, and it might just get in people's heads.
But his character assassination has started way too late, and now he just looks like a whinging twat!
Khan doesn't really believe any of this shit and he's a cock really. Deep down , Khan is now worried about who he fights next, because he can't keep avoiding punchers and top fighters in the division. Exactly who will he fight?

WTF does 'name value' mean? Bullshit value, hype value? Says it all, Khans only credentials for a Mayweather slot are that he gets on telly a lot doing dumb ass interviews. His PR bills and Oscars investments in him look distinctly unlikely to be repaid, Ha bloody Ha, you have to walk the walk..... And he aint.

[Master]

I am not a fan of Khan's and he does not have a great record at welterweight to justify a fight with Floyd but what he did at light welter should not be ignored. he took on anyone and everyone, Bradley avoided him.

If Khan had the same attitude at welterweight he would have either got knocked out or forced a fight with Floyd by now.

[Batman]

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.

please don't speak on my behalf

[Beanflicker]

please don't speak on my behalf

If he had whipped Prescott, Peterson and Garcia you wouldn't be fawning over him and demanding a Floyd match?

Child please!

[Batman]

please don't speak on my behalf

If he had whipped Prescott, Peterson and Garcia you wouldn't be fawning over him and demanding a Floyd match?

Child please!

One of my biggest regrets in life was that I decided to go out on the piss on the night of the Prescott fight and missed him getting sparked out live, didn't like him before the his first loss, didn't like him after his first loss