O'Sullivan - Eubank (WBA full title eliminator) on Joshua - Whyte undercard

[Primo Carnera]

You could actually see Eubank getting a GGG shot because of his name, it would be great if GGG came to the UK for the first time and ruined Eubank. Although im praying on Spike doing that first

why would you want eubank to lose?

hes a charactor, there is a bit of excitement around him and its enjoyable

if he lost badly and faded as a result who would be have to be excited about? fury? BJS? David Haye?

Id be excited about a lot of upcoming UK fighters who you haven't mentioned there and I couldn't give one about Jnr.

I'm with you on this Tam. You can get excited about Campbell, the Smiths, both Selby's now,Quigg, Frampton, Warrington, Brook, Eggington, the list goes on, and Not one of them has said things like "my trainer is only there to apply Vaseline, if I'm doing something wrong , I know it and I can put it right!"
That is just one small example of the horseshit this halfwit comes out with.
His old man talks quite a bit of crap, but he's already backed it up in spade loads and earned the right to do so.
This fucker has yet to do fucking anything!

i dont think any of those fighters you mention are as electrfying in the ring as eubank

i like all of them, none throw the combination power punches that eubank does and i like all of them outside of the ring, but non get my attention like eubank

Well each to their own I suppose. We obviously like different things in our fighters. My preference is for good un-deluded fighters that don't disrespect their trainers amongst others and do their talking mostly in the ring.
In a nutshell , Boxers not Blaggers.������

Who cares if he might be deluded. Dream big!
Dream Big? mate , this ain't Hollywood , this is real life. I supposed you'd like it if I shouted from the rooftops that I was gonna beat GGG? and spare me the Clay comparison because he was an Olympic Champion at least.

Should we all prefer "Golovkin would knock me out" Saunders? What kind of an attitude is that for a fighter to have?
In answer to your questions , Yes, and it's a realistic attitude.

Whatever his mind set is its littereally breath taking watching him unleash punch after punch after punch! That last round against Chudinov was exciting! Hes capable of being exciting. He does what we complain a lot of top fighters dont and that is go for the kill and with mean intentions.

Breathtaking? Punch after punch after punch? Me thinks someone is getting a teeny bit carried away here. The Guy's done literally (btw, that's how you're supposed to spell it, don't mention it fuck all .

Pathetic

In fact regarding an Ali comparison you sound very much like one of those Americans who suddenly got behind the hated Sonny Liston to see that arrogant Ali who was boasting he was the best of all times get beaten.

Very constructive reply. Listen, when you start bragging about how great you are and how you can see faults in undoubtedly the best boxer in your division , you:
A. Have to have achieved something you can base this optimism on in order to have your comments respected. And
B. When you get an opportunity, and when it counts, you have to deliver.
If you don't meet those 2 criteria above, you run a very dangerous risk of making yourself look a complete cunt.
As far as I'm concerned (and I'd love somebody to prove me wrong) , he doesn't meet the criteria for A, and the one chance he had to deliver on B., he failed miserably against Saunders.
Those first 6 rounds, he was made to look like the complete novice that he was. If that was GGG against him, he would've been out of there in the first 2 rounds.