Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Britkid View Post
Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post

So you feel not protecting property rights and giving government more power would be part of this answer.
Yes, ultimately no one would 'own' property, it should eventually 'belong' to the 'syndicate', but initially that would be the state, as a part of an interim Socialist Federation. More 'government power' would occur, but under a form of Direct Democracy.
So.....mob rule is best?
In general terms, yes.




Mob rule is how individuals of a minority status be it economic, race, creed, sexual orientation, religion, etc get demonized to the point where the majority see no harm in killing off the "non-believers" those who do not assimilate. That's how you get your Holocausts, your Holomodors, your Great Leap Forwards, that's how you get leaders that say "1 death is a tragedy, a million deaths are but a statistic".


Rule of Law, property rights, limited government, liberty...those are very important concepts that direct democracies/mob rule do not value.


And no doubt you're anti-gun as well correct?