Good question. No it doesn't matter where you are ranked as no list will ever be definitive. Just being mentioned as an all-time great should be enough. I can't even name 50 heavyweights without boxrec, so I guess 33 or 39 is utterly irrelevant.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?
Good question. No it doesn't matter where you are ranked as no list will ever be definitive. Just being mentioned as an all-time great should be enough. I can't even name 50 heavyweights without boxrec, so I guess 33 or 39 is utterly irrelevant.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?
Here's my top heavyweights. I don't think i've left out many all-time greats, if I have these guys would batter them anyway.
1. Lennox Lewis
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Evander Holyfield
4. George Foreman
5. Mike Tyson
6. Joe Frazier
7. Vitali Klitschko
8. Jack Dempsey
9. Riddick Bowe
10. Earnie Shavers
11. Wlad Klitschko
12. Joe Louis
13. Larry Holmes
14. Sonny Liston
15. Gary Mason
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?
Gary Mason. What happened there? Could you only really think of 14?
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?
Do an all time top ten of greatest heavyweights based on their career achievments then,musing the same fghters do a top ten on who would get the most wns if they were to all fight each other.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks