Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 46

Thread: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,772
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Tyson beats Lewis, who fights on his back foot being too cautious for 12 rounds.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    That Tyson all day!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,425
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    784
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Is this even a serious question? Tyson every day of the week and twice on Sundays!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Tyson by stoppage or decision. Lewis would either spoil or get stopped.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    793
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...
    You basing that on the actual fight which sounds ridiculous. Would you say Holmes stops or even beats a young Ali?

    Would you say Marciano stops or beats a young Louis?

    Fighters need the reflexes and skills that made them succesfull in the first place and Mikes had long gone at the point they fought.

    When you say struggled you mean had to go to points because those fights he struggled in he still completely dominated unlike Lewis who should have lost against Mercer. Lews struggled with fighters who put it on him. Mavrovich had Lewis on the ropes in parts of their fight.

    Lewis never had a prolonged period of dominance because of thise knockout losses. There was never a point in his career where people thought he was unbeatable unlike Mike Tyson.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,425
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    784
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...
    You basing that on the actual fight which sounds ridiculous. Would you say Holmes stops or even beats a young Ali?

    Would you say Marciano stops or beats a young Louis?

    Fighters need the reflexes and skills that made them succesfull in the first place and Mikes had long gone at the point they fought.

    When you say struggled you mean had to go to points because those fights he struggled in he still completely dominated unlike Lewis who should have lost against Mercer. Lews struggled with fighters who put it on him. Mavrovich had Lewis on the ropes in parts of their fight.

    Lewis never had a prolonged period of dominance because of thise knockout losses. There was never a point in his career where people thought he was unbeatable unlike Mike Tyson.
    Gotta agree with Ross here. At the times we're talking about , Tyson never really struggled with anyone and let's face it, he was always fighting bigger fighters than himself. Also at that time, he beat Larry Holmes (Albeit an old Larry Holmes) and who Jabs better than him?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,254
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1213
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    I think Tyson might be too intimidated. He always struggled when top class fighters fought him with confidence. He really only beat Ruddock when faced with that type of challenge. I would take Lewis by fairly comfortable decision.
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    793
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 2002 Lennox Lewis vs 1988 Mike Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Fascinating match up, in my opinion. Right off the bat we all have to admit that if Rahman and McCall could stop Zlennox with one shot, Tyson could also. So... Tyson will always have that punchers chance in this match up.

    Looking at the fighters and their mentality objectively, however, we all have to admit that Tyson always struggled vs large, physical fighters and those who jabbed well. I also feel that Lennox was vulnerable when he overlooked his opponent as evidenced by his fights vs. McCall, Rahman, Bruno, and Mercer, to name a few. Lennox would not take Tyson lightly, and I feel like Lennox was most dominant in fights vs those he viewed as dangerous, such as Tua, Grant, Ruddock, and Golota.

    Lennox's size, boxing ability, jab, and smothering tactics would alwZys trouble Tyson. Mike was extremely fast and aggressive in his prime, so a knockout of Lewis is always a realistic possibility. I think the more likely outcome, however, is that Lennox breaks Mike down with the jab, leaning on Tyson and smothering him inside, before landing the big shots late for the stoppage. Just my take though...
    You basing that on the actual fight which sounds ridiculous. Would you say Holmes stops or even beats a young Ali?

    Would you say Marciano stops or beats a young Louis?

    Fighters need the reflexes and skills that made them succesfull in the first place and Mikes had long gone at the point they fought.

    When you say struggled you mean had to go to points because those fights he struggled in he still completely dominated unlike Lewis who should have lost against Mercer. Lews struggled with fighters who put it on him. Mavrovich had Lewis on the ropes in parts of their fight.

    Lewis never had a prolonged period of dominance because of thise knockout losses. There was never a point in his career where people thought he was unbeatable unlike Mike Tyson.
    I would argue that Lennox was dominant for a longer time than Tyson. Lewis lost to McCall in the mid-90s and Rahman in 2000/01 time frame, and avenged both losses. The truth is that Tyson never fought a complete, large heavyweight who wasn't terrified of him until Buster Douglas. Douglas, Lennox, and Evander all used the jab to control and punish Tyson. Mike was well past his best vs Lennox, but was considered the baddest man on the planet when he faced the other two. Additionally, while he did win those fights vs Tucker, Ruddock, and Smith, he did struggle with their sheer size, and none were ANYWHERE near the complete/elite fighter that 2002 Lennox was.

    For your other questions, I think Holmes gives Ali fits prime vs prime, and Louis beats Marciano, but takes some serious punishment in the process.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Did Mike Tyson duck Forman & Lewis?
    By SlimTrae in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-21-2015, 11:44 AM
  2. Tyson of 1988 versus Lewis of 1999
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 03:29 PM
  3. who wins a peak mike tyson or lennox lewis
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 258
    Last Post: 05-17-2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Lennox Lewis Mike Tyson press conference
    By The Fightfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 06:23 AM
  5. LENNOX LEWIS VS MIKE TYSON FULL FIGHT
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 06:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing