Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB
If it was that easy to place bombs in a building that runs 24/7... why wouldn't the goverment just say Terrorists planted the bombs in the building?

Why would they throw planes into the equation just to complicate things for them selves?
well because it would look even more suspect wouldnt it they even were saying that they have remote control planes or something like that i dont believe it all by any means but i do believe some of it
What would be more suspect about it?!

BANG!

And then faked evidence such as CCTV footage is shown of what ever and the blame for the lapse in sercurity goes on security staff who died in the tower...

If we beleive they could take over a plane and bring weapons past airport security, a building important to national security then some how placing explosives in a Comercial building that has 100000s or people and equipment moving in and out of it every day doesn't seem as unbeleivable does it?

We are talking about the most powerfull goverment in teh world with the world's largest economy, why would they go to 'Budget conspiracys R us'?

Loose change is a load of crap... as with this documentry... the second they raised to point about Jet Fuel not burning hot enough to melt Steel I turned it off...

Does a steel structure that has had a Jet weighing tens of tonnes flying into it really have to be liquified before it collapses?

It didn't have to be even half way near melting point for a failure in the structure to happen.