"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
To be blunt, for someone of your intelligence, I do not know if the excuse of ignorance is good enough for your views; I start to wonder whether it is a prejudice, particularly when you come out with the 'I have Muslim friends' defence.
But then I think: It is El Kabong, he is just throwing out a cliche... So his only 'prejudice' is lack of originality...
"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
And before anyone has a hissyfit....I'm not anti-Muslim, I have many friends who are Muslims, I frequently ask for their views and clarifications regarding Middle East politics and to be quite honest some of them are not interested in the Middle East at all seeing how they have assimilated into American life and of course I treat them no differently than any of my other friends.
I'm just frustrated that ISIS is allowed to exist and honestly it doesn't look to me like Obama is doing ANYTHING to fix the situation.....you think expanding drone strikes is going to win us allies? Obama is a pussy. Obama would rather disarm the American citizen than get rid of ISIS.
Not much mention of 5 Syrians with stolen passports being caught making way through Honduras to U.S. There are hearing so much cartoon BS about a HUUUUGE wall being the answer that we are forgetting the best allies we may have are those closest watching the boarders before our own. There will be a day when we yearn for 100 orange pickers "taking our jobs" over the true wolves on the doorstep.
Well that COULD have been the case, the issue with the War in Iraq was the small holding force Donald Rumsfeld chose and W backed him on. One could only think "What could have happened if a REAL occupying force been in place after Saddam fell?"
But hindsight is 20/20
Not until AFTER the troop surge and in that case we had paid to keep some groups from fighting as well (how fucking dumb is that?). We needed an occupying force IMMEDIATELY after the fall of Baghdad and the capture of Saddam in order to keep sectarians from seeing the lack of a head of the nation as carte blanche to get retribution on their enemies from the Saddam regime.
There needed to be a normalization, there needed to be concessions made by the majority in order to keep the minority pleased with being "Iraqi" which is still a foreign feeling to most of those folks. All groups needed to be represented in the rebuilding of that nation and the only way they'd cooperate is through a show of force so overwhelming they wouldn't dare fight back.....now seizing Iraq was a piece of cake, holding it and implementing a plan to keep peace was where the fuck up really started.
But that's MY view, I think VC would probably have a better understanding.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks