Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  4
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 371

Thread: Scientific Fraud

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Kabong Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/op...?emc=eta1&_r=1


    So if you don't believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming/Climate Change then you're no better than a Nazi.....so sayeth Timothy Snyder.

    Denying science imperils the future by summoning the ghosts of the past.
    ....yes......"science"
    Remind us again Lyle - what are your qualifications for distinguishing science from "science"? If I recall, you are unable to perform a high school level regression analysis.

    Oh that's right. You are a graduate of what real scientists refer to as Google U.
    The same "real scientists" that think a bogus consensus makes something fact?
    Again, what are your qualifications to determine who is a "real scientist"? To determine that a consensus held by real scientists is bogus? How would you know the difference?

    You write extremely well. Your arguments sound quite convincing to the layman. However, as you lack even the most basic scientific training, your arguments are specious. Your arguments embody the very essence of sophistry, they sound fantastic yet are in actuality vacuous ramblings without one single shred of reputable supporting evidence.

    You present articles written by non-scientific journalists and point to experts who have sold scientific credibility to become corporate shills. Moreover, you lack any sort of expertise to discern good science from bad science, as you have amply demonstrated.

    At the end of the day, all your arguments fall under the heading of one man's very vocal, very articulate, and very emphatic opinion - one that is hopelessly uninformed and biased. You have argued that debate is necessary to discern truth, and in this we agree wholeheartedly. The most crucial cornerstone of scientific query is that a proposed idea must withstand scrutiny from all sides in order to gain support from the scientific community.

    You are, good sir, as my father would put it, quite full of shit. If you had any type of expertise at all, I would be more inclined to give your arguments due consideration. However, since your expertise lies in the propagation of the opinions of others who happen to support your point of view - without a single iota of understanding of the science underlying the matter - you will naturally understand when I group your lofty opinions on the topic in with those of a particularly virulent bowel movement.

    Again, as my father would put it, when it comes to science you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.
    And that's great that you took the time to write all that out....but I'm afraid it doesn't discredit my view.....it just assumes your view is the right one.

    But hey, I'm sure once millions die due to restrictions your side wanted to implement and anthropogenic global warming is found to be a total hoax or best result for you "miscalculated" you'll feel REALLY proud of yourself.

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Scientific Fraud


  3. #3
    El Kabong Guest

  4. #4
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Scientific Fraud


  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Scientific Fraud


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    925
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Scientific Fraud

    What I'm finding quite bad is what we are doing to the oceans. Not the temperature but the noise and over fishing. We, the Chinese and others have put high tech sonar all over the worlds oceans and studies have shown its driving whales and dolphins crazy which is leading to mass beaching of the fishies. The Japanese, Chinese and others are catching everything they can to the point of extinction. I think we are much more harmful to the world the raising the temperature a few degrees

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Scientific Fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    What I'm finding quite bad is what we are doing to the oceans. Not the temperature but the noise and over fishing. We, the Chinese and others have put high tech sonar all over the worlds oceans and studies have shown its driving whales and dolphins crazy which is leading to mass beaching of the fishies. The Japanese, Chinese and others are catching everything they can to the point of extinction. I think we are much more harmful to the world the raising the temperature a few degrees
    Humans are the virus. Apparently the oceans are now 90% depleted and human population is of course rising exponentially. I guess they will have to genetically engineer more foods with minimal research and rather than just kill everyone directly have them be poisoned slowly and continue the population growth as it would be incorrect to tell stupid people that their mindless pleasure has serious consequences.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2007, 05:11 PM
  2. Time to own up, I am a fraud!!!!
    By SimonH in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-20-2006, 02:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing