Last win by any fighter better than this for Fury.

[ross]

Fury won fair and square , and I may pick other fighters to defeat him ,however one thing I won't do again is take anything away from his achievement .
He deserves to earn big money however long his reign lasts , he hadn't fought anybody until last night and now he is the champ.
Can't think of a bigger win for a while.
Again well done Ross and well done to the new champ.

Right Al, thankyou!

I wanst being a fan boy or anything like that. I could see his qualities and could see past his physique, talk and background.

Like I said, Liston v Clay!!

There is no win bigger than this at any weight since Douglas beat Tyson. Let that sink in.

The other heavyweight greats have no better win, Lewis, Holyfield. Nor do Mayweather and Pacquiao have a better win! Roy Jones, Oscar De La Hoya, none of them!

Tyson is getting better to!

Like Al says, it was a massive achievement and he deserves to be where he is. Like Al, I may not choose him to beat every HW out there, but until somebody proves any different, he is the No.1 in the division.
However, the reason you're calling it a bigger victory than the Mayweather, DLH, etc.etc. is because all those proven greats were never as big an underdog because everybody knew they were top class. Tyson did fantastic last night, but there's a long way to go.
I've seen most of the fight now (too bored to watch it all tbh) and I thought it was a superb performance by Fury compared to the rest of his career, and it's not his fault that the first 9 rounds were like Grounhog day. I struggled to give Klitschko any rounds really, I just don't think he could work Fury out, really poor.
That is full credit to Fury.

Got nothing to do with being an underdog.

Name me one win as good as this on anyone elses record since Douglas?

Who has beaten a unified fighter who had been so dominant for so long?

Of course it's got something to do with being an underdog.otherwise why would you mention Douglas?
I mean, I could turn around and say "will Fury have a similar career to Douglas?"
In reality, Wlad is probably the only champ to lose his title after having held it for 11 years in recent times, so obviously it's about being long odds!
Was it a great performance-Yes
Was it better than Hatton's v Tzsyu?
Was it better than Honeyghan v Curry?
Was it better than Benn v McLennan?
So is it about Great Performance or is it about the odds?

Tszyu is the closest and maybe equal but Tszyu fought in London, not Oz or Russia. I did actually use this as an example of why you shouldnt all be writing Tyson off along with Clay v Liston.

McClellan was in his first fight at super middle against Benn and was never unified at middle.

Curry? I did say after Douglas v Tyson.

[Spicoli]

Upsets make the boxing world go around and you dig below the easy to know, top names and such, we can find a lot as big as this when put into perspective. An undefeated world ranked fighter who is being called the "next" so and so is the dominate monster in the eyes of some unheralded journeyman who is shipped in to fall over but refuses and takes the biggest win of career. It just happened last night. Just my opinion I spose. In p4p surprises, maybe Randall v Chavez? Randall came out of drug rehab and had been KO'd prior...he wasn't even ranked. While Chavez had received shady draw with Whitaker and close run with Taylor, he was still very dominate and riding p4p top rank for years. He was also known for rock chin without being sparked few times prior

One that always gets me is Orlando Canizales v Sergio Reyes 1. Sure..on paper Canizales was declared "winner"...in his hometown...but anyone who saw that knows he lost. Again, p4p ranked and coming in with what? 14,15 defenses? Reyes had all of 10 professional fights and had faced absolutely noooo one of substance. He won that fight

Not to dump on your bwoy man, I may not care for his style but he has joined a long line of guys who defy the odds, shove it in the face of establishment and proceed to dump the boxing world on its fat thick head. All the while laughing like a loon and earning every bit of it. Gotta love that!!

[ross]

Upsets make the boxing world go around and you dig below the easy to know, top names and such, we can find a lot as big as this when put into perspective. An undefeated world ranked fighter who is being called the "next" so and so is the dominate monster in the eyes of some unheralded journeyman who is shipped in to fall over but refuses and takes the biggest win of career. It just happened last night. Just my opinion I spose. In p4p surprises, maybe Randall v Chavez? Randall came out of drug rehab and had been KO'd prior...he wasn't even ranked. While Chavez had received shady draw with Whitaker and close run with Taylor, he was still very dominate and riding p4p top rank for years. He was also known for rock chin without being sparked few times prior

One that always gets me is Orlando Canizales v Sergio Reyes 1. Sure..on paper Canizales was declared "winner"...in his hometown...but anyone who saw that knows he lost. Again, p4p ranked and coming in with what? 14,15 defenses? Reyes had all of 10 professional fights and had faced absolutely noooo one of substance. He won that fight

Not to dump on your bwoy man, I may not care for his style but he has joined a long line of guys who defy the odds, shove it in the face of establishment and proceed to dump the boxing world on its fat thick head. All the while laughing like a loon and earning every bit of it. Gotta love that!!

Im not talking about big upsets.

Im saying who has beaten any other fighter as dominant as Wlad.

[beenKOed]

Hasim Rahman Ko of Lennox Lewis. Did any mention this one?

[ross]

Hasim Rahman Ko of Lennox Lewis. Did any mention this one?

Lewis was only a champ for 5 years when Rahman knocked him out

Also, Wlad has been facing his mandatories unlike Lewis who dumped the IBF to avoid Byrd.

[IamInuit]

Upsets make the boxing world go around and you dig below the easy to know, top names and such, we can find a lot as big as this when put into perspective. An undefeated world ranked fighter who is being called the "next" so and so is the dominate monster in the eyes of some unheralded journeyman who is shipped in to fall over but refuses and takes the biggest win of career. It just happened last night. Just my opinion I spose. In p4p surprises, maybe Randall v Chavez? Randall came out of drug rehab and had been KO'd prior...he wasn't even ranked. While Chavez had received shady draw with Whitaker and close run with Taylor, he was still very dominate and riding p4p top rank for years. He was also known for rock chin without being sparked few times prior

One that always gets me is Orlando Canizales v Sergio Reyes 1. Sure..on paper Canizales was declared "winner"...in his hometown...but anyone who saw that knows he lost. Again, p4p ranked and coming in with what? 14,15 defenses? Reyes had all of 10 professional fights and had faced absolutely noooo one of substance. He won that fight

Not to dump on your bwoy man, I may not care for his style but he has joined a long line of guys who defy the odds, shove it in the face of establishment and proceed to dump the boxing world on its fat thick head. All the while laughing like a loon and earning every bit of it. Gotta love that!!

Im not talking about big upsets.

Im saying who has beaten any other fighter as dominant as Wlad.

They are big upsets by extension.
Clay/Liston
Schmeling/Louis
Tarver/Jones
Leonard/Hagler
Turpin/Robinson
Rahman/Lewis
Tunney/Dempsey
Douglas/Tyson
Sanders/Wlad
Spinks/Ali
Spinks/ Holmes

[Dark Lord Al]

We cant get to carried away here , when Mike Spinks outpointed a 36 year old Larry Holmes , Holmes was considered to have got old and was out paced.
Tyson Fury himself said before the fight , if I cant beat a 39 year old man I will retire.
So yes fury is the HW champion legit , and deserves both credit and the riches that come with that , but all fighters careers come to an end at some point in time.
Let see if fury can make his own legacy in the new era of HW boxing.
Yes you can only beat what is in front of you , but I would prefer Wlad to hang up his gloves because he has be awful to watch for many years.

[Primo Carnera]

Ps. Absolutely done you yet again! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Howlin Mad Missy]

on the one hand you're saying Wlad is an old washed up plank of wood then saying it's a win that will go down in history as one of the greats

[p4pking]

How about Taylor over Hopkins, or Tarver over Jones? Both similar as per your criteria. Still haven't watched this fight though, and can't believe Fury won so fair play to him and you @ross .

[ross]

on the one hand you're saying Wlad is an old washed up plank of wood then saying it's a win that will go down in history as one of the greats

Iv never said that. I said he wont deal with Fury who you dont like and you dont like this and are a poor mod judging by that childish comment you yourself made earlier about him being a "peg seller" that would have been deleted by mods on other forums.

[Primo Carnera]

Fury won fair and square , and I may pick other fighters to defeat him ,however one thing I won't do again is take anything away from his achievement .
He deserves to earn big money however long his reign lasts , he hadn't fought anybody until last night and now he is the champ.
Can't think of a bigger win for a while.
Again well done Ross and well done to the new champ.

Right Al, thankyou!

I wanst being a fan boy or anything like that. I could see his qualities and could see past his physique, talk and background.

Like I said, Liston v Clay!!

There is no win bigger than this at any weight since Douglas beat Tyson. Let that sink in.

The other heavyweight greats have no better win, Lewis, Holyfield. Nor do Mayweather and Pacquiao have a better win! Roy Jones, Oscar De La Hoya, none of them!

Tyson is getting better to!

Like Al says, it was a massive achievement and he deserves to be where he is. Like Al, I may not choose him to beat every HW out there, but until somebody proves any different, he is the No.1 in the division.
However, the reason you're calling it a bigger victory than the Mayweather, DLH, etc.etc. is because all those proven greats were never as big an underdog because everybody knew they were top class. Tyson did fantastic last night, but there's a long way to go.
I've seen most of the fight now (too bored to watch it all tbh) and I thought it was a superb performance by Fury compared to the rest of his career, and it's not his fault that the first 9 rounds were like Grounhog day. I struggled to give Klitschko any rounds really, I just don't think he could work Fury out, really poor.
That is full credit to Fury.

Got nothing to do with being an underdog.

Name me one win as good as this on anyone elses record since Douglas?

Who has beaten a unified fighter who had been so dominant for so long?

Of course it's got something to do with being an underdog.otherwise why would you mention Douglas?
I mean, I could turn around and say "will Fury have a similar career to Douglas?"
In reality, Wlad is probably the only champ to lose his title after having held it for 11 years in recent times, so obviously it's about being long odds!
Was it a great performance-Yes
Was it better than Hatton's v Tzsyu?
Was it better than Honeyghan v Curry?
Was it better than Benn v McLennan?
So is it about Great Performance or is it about the odds?

Tszyu is the closest and maybe equal but Tszyu fought in London, not Oz or Russia. I did actually use this as an example of why you shouldnt all be writing Tyson off along with Clay v Liston.

McClellan was in his first fight at super middle against Benn and was never unified at middle.

Curry? I did say after Douglas v Tyson.

Ok , but the question is so loaded
" Last win by any fighter better than this for Fury.
Im interested to know if any other fighter from any weight has had a better win than this since Douglas v Tyson where such a longstandng, dominant, P4P best, future great, unified champion has been beaten so emphatically in his own back yard."
It's like saying "has there ever been a bigger supporter of Fury that lives in Guernsey and name begins with R and ends with S and has an O and another S in it?
How about,
Pac beating Barrera?
Bradley beating Pac?
Marquez beating Pac?
Cotto beating Martinez?

[ross]

Fury won fair and square , and I may pick other fighters to defeat him ,however one thing I won't do again is take anything away from his achievement .
He deserves to earn big money however long his reign lasts , he hadn't fought anybody until last night and now he is the champ.
Can't think of a bigger win for a while.
Again well done Ross and well done to the new champ.

Right Al, thankyou!

I wanst being a fan boy or anything like that. I could see his qualities and could see past his physique, talk and background.

Like I said, Liston v Clay!!

There is no win bigger than this at any weight since Douglas beat Tyson. Let that sink in.

The other heavyweight greats have no better win, Lewis, Holyfield. Nor do Mayweather and Pacquiao have a better win! Roy Jones, Oscar De La Hoya, none of them!

Tyson is getting better to!

Like Al says, it was a massive achievement and he deserves to be where he is. Like Al, I may not choose him to beat every HW out there, but until somebody proves any different, he is the No.1 in the division.
However, the reason you're calling it a bigger victory than the Mayweather, DLH, etc.etc. is because all those proven greats were never as big an underdog because everybody knew they were top class. Tyson did fantastic last night, but there's a long way to go.
I've seen most of the fight now (too bored to watch it all tbh) and I thought it was a superb performance by Fury compared to the rest of his career, and it's not his fault that the first 9 rounds were like Grounhog day. I struggled to give Klitschko any rounds really, I just don't think he could work Fury out, really poor.
That is full credit to Fury.

Got nothing to do with being an underdog.

Name me one win as good as this on anyone elses record since Douglas?

Who has beaten a unified fighter who had been so dominant for so long?

Of course it's got something to do with being an underdog.otherwise why would you mention Douglas?
I mean, I could turn around and say "will Fury have a similar career to Douglas?"
In reality, Wlad is probably the only champ to lose his title after having held it for 11 years in recent times, so obviously it's about being long odds!
Was it a great performance-Yes
Was it better than Hatton's v Tzsyu?
Was it better than Honeyghan v Curry?
Was it better than Benn v McLennan?
So is it about Great Performance or is it about the odds?

Tszyu is the closest and maybe equal but Tszyu fought in London, not Oz or Russia. I did actually use this as an example of why you shouldnt all be writing Tyson off along with Clay v Liston.

McClellan was in his first fight at super middle against Benn and was never unified at middle.

Curry? I did say after Douglas v Tyson.

Ok , but the question is so loaded
" Last win by any fighter better than this for Fury.
Im interested to know if any other fighter from any weight has had a better win than this since Douglas v Tyson where such a longstandng, dominant, P4P best, future great, unified champion has been beaten so emphatically in his own back yard."
It's like saying "has there ever been a bigger supporter of Fury that lives in Guernsey and name begins with R and ends with S and has an O and another S in it?
How about,
Pac beating Barrera?
Bradley beating Pac?
Marquez beating Pac?
Cotto beating Martinez?

No your not reading.

Which of those was beating the best in the world and champ for 9 years and unified? None of them were as dominant in their division as Wlad was at heavy.

[Primo Carnera]

Wins by any fighter better than this for Fury since 1990 (that I can think of):

Holyfield Vs Bowe (fight 2)

Holyfield Vs Tyson (fight 1)

Foreman Vs Moorer

Griffin Vs Jones (fight 1)

Barkley Vs Hearns (fight 1)

Little Vs Nunn

Benn Vs McClellan

Toney Vs Nunn

Forrest Vs Mosley (fight 1)

Randall Vs Chavez (fight 1)

Barrera Vs Naseem

Pacquiao Vs Barrera

Johnson Vs Jones

Tapia Vs Romero

Now whittle that down to who was unbeaten and defending champ at that weight for 9 years and had unified!

Fury won fair and square , and I may pick other fighters to defeat him ,however one thing I won't do again is take anything away from his achievement .
He deserves to earn big money however long his reign lasts , he hadn't fought anybody until last night and now he is the champ.
Can't think of a bigger win for a while.
Again well done Ross and well done to the new champ.

Right Al, thankyou!

I wanst being a fan boy or anything like that. I could see his qualities and could see past his physique, talk and background.

Like I said, Liston v Clay!!

There is no win bigger than this at any weight since Douglas beat Tyson. Let that sink in.

The other heavyweight greats have no better win, Lewis, Holyfield. Nor do Mayweather and Pacquiao have a better win! Roy Jones, Oscar De La Hoya, none of them!

Tyson is getting better to!

Like Al says, it was a massive achievement and he deserves to be where he is. Like Al, I may not choose him to beat every HW out there, but until somebody proves any different, he is the No.1 in the division.
However, the reason you're calling it a bigger victory than the Mayweather, DLH, etc.etc. is because all those proven greats were never as big an underdog because everybody knew they were top class. Tyson did fantastic last night, but there's a long way to go.
I've seen most of the fight now (too bored to watch it all tbh) and I thought it was a superb performance by Fury compared to the rest of his career, and it's not his fault that the first 9 rounds were like Grounhog day. I struggled to give Klitschko any rounds really, I just don't think he could work Fury out, really poor.
That is full credit to Fury.

Got nothing to do with being an underdog.

Name me one win as good as this on anyone elses record since Douglas?

Who has beaten a unified fighter who had been so dominant for so long?

Of course it's got something to do with being an underdog.otherwise why would you mention Douglas?
I mean, I could turn around and say "will Fury have a similar career to Douglas?"
In reality, Wlad is probably the only champ to lose his title after having held it for 11 years in recent times, so obviously it's about being long odds!
Was it a great performance-Yes
Was it better than Hatton's v Tzsyu?
Was it better than Honeyghan v Curry?
Was it better than Benn v McLennan?
So is it about Great Performance or is it about the odds?

Tszyu is the closest and maybe equal but Tszyu fought in London, not Oz or Russia. I did actually use this as an example of why you shouldnt all be writing Tyson off along with Clay v Liston.

McClellan was in his first fight at super middle against Benn and was never unified at middle.

Curry? I did say after Douglas v Tyson.

Ok , but the question is so loaded
" Last win by any fighter better than this for Fury.
Im interested to know if any other fighter from any weight has had a better win than this since Douglas v Tyson where such a longstandng, dominant, P4P best, future great, unified champion has been beaten so emphatically in his own back yard."
It's like saying "has there ever been a bigger supporter of Fury that lives in Guernsey and name begins with R and ends with S and has an O and another S in it?
How about,
Pac beating Barrera?
Bradley beating Pac?
Marquez beating Pac?
Cotto beating Martinez?

No your not reading.

Which of those was beating the best in the world and champ for 9 years and unified? None of them were as dominant in their division as Wlad was at heavy.

No, YOU'RE not reading. Here's another one......... Has there ever been a better number between 7 & 9 than 8? Or....
Has there ever been a better, more circular vowel than O? Maybe.......
Has there ever been a better Rugby World Cup winner in the past 7 years than the All Blacks?

[ross]

Yes it is very specific because it such a good win.

Wlad was much more dominant and over a much longer period than most of those names put forward.