Fury stripped of his IBF Title. Isn't it cheap?

[El Kabong]

How long did Wlad have the ibf title? Would the ibf have stripped wlad if he had won instead of fury?

A bipolar like move from ibf Id say.

Well the issue is the rematch clause I would think. Had Wladimir won, the mandatory would have been his very next fight, since Fury won and Wladimir wants the rematch the IBF is getting itchy feet and moving on......it's nonsense the belt should stay with Fury and the IBF mandatory should be the next fight or they could go the route of the WBA and do a "Super Champion" thing.

[erics44]

Fury wlad off, wlad v Briggs for the ibf

[TitoFan]

Stripping is "in" these days.

[Britkid]

Be it WBA, WBC, IBF, IBU, WBU, The Ring, WBO, ABC, DEF or GHI; they mean nothing in themselves; the title is made by the name of the Champion. Love him, loathe him or have complete indifference to him, Tyson Fury is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World. And to the fancy, that should be all that matters.

[0james0]

Meanwhile, Wilder picks another poor opponent he can make himself look bad at beating.
As soon as Wilder won, his mandatory should have been Wlad, how could he not be? (Other than bulls hit ranking excuses) the belt owners should be forcing the best fights available.