The really bad decision was when this idiot decided to post the result of the fight in the title of this thread!
Don't be a moron!
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
The really bad decision was when this idiot decided to post the result of the fight in the title of this thread!
Don't be a moron!
Array
You know Rocco, fair and good point! I've whined about spoilers especially in titles and respect that was my bad and oversight bud. I hope we didn't ruin the fight when you watch it. Secondly, blow me. If you roam a boxing board the morning after such clear corruption you run the risk and benefit information that it actually happened, even if you're in ninja mode. Shine a light on that shat I say. Cheers and post your score up.
Array
Wow spoiler alert lol![]()
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
Array
I like Walters and thought he was going to be Crawford type special. What happened to this future star?
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I still like Walters and think he has an exciting style. That being said, and to your point, I will offer the following two observations:
1) While I enjoy Walters' in ring "style" of fighting, I never considered him as talented, versatile, or skillful as Crawford. Crawford is a classy boxer-puncher who can box stylishly behind the jab, fight orthodox and southpaw, brawl when necessary, make adjustments when necessary, and end things with one shot. Walters is a beast who, to borrow an analogy from Marvin Hagler, is like Pac Man (the video game, not Manny Paquiaou) in the ring, chewing up whoever is in front of him. This leads me to my second point...
2) Walters may be a special fighter still, just not above 126, due to his reliance/necessity for size and brute force advantages for his style. Think of Marvin Hagler and Ricky Hatton as examples. Marvin was an ATG, but he never went above 160, likely because he knew his strength and power advantages at that weight would likely not be there at 168/175, and he wouldn't be the same fighter. Hatton wasn't nearly as great as Marvin, but he was much more daunting/effective at 140 than he was at 147. Bam Bam Rios is another example of a style that is effective at one weight, but loses advantages as the weight increases. Something to think about...
As for who won, I agree with the majority. Tough to give Sosa more than a couple of rounds.
Last edited by mikeeod; 12-21-2015 at 07:52 PM.
Array
I watched it knowing the result and the controversy. Normally these "bad" scores are blown out of proportion (I was expecting to make a case for Sosa), but blimey, Sosa won a few rounds if you're being generous.
Worst thing is - Walters was lucky to get away with a draw. Mad.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
Hey take a pil ffs.
There is no such thing as a spoiler in 2016. Its an oxymoron where the boxing world is concerned. If people dont want to know something for some reason then turn off the computer. Dont come to an international boxing forum and tell people not to spoil it cause you have not seen it yet. So what if its in the tiltle rocco...tough shit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks