Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 178

Thread: Who is the best and worst of britains 12 world champions?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    736
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is the best and worst of britains 12 world champions?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    So now you're back to claiming the rankings as accurate?

    Therefore they prove me correct that the welterweight division is stronger than heavyweight. You can't deny that otherwise Fury's ranking is utterly meaningless. Fact.
    Ok the Welterweight division is more competative where no one is really much better than the rest I agree with you.

    My whole point of starting posting in this pointless thread is to point out the blatantly obvious that Tyson is better than Brook as is backed up by indipendant rankings and makes a mockery of all your bitter biased opinions.
    Before the Wlad fight Fury was higher in the rankings? Was Wlad better then Fury all the way until he lost to him? The boxrec rankings mean fuck all. Sure they dont have Gonzalez or Inoue in their top 20

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1405
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who is the best and worst of britains 12 world champions?

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    So now you're back to claiming the rankings as accurate?

    Therefore they prove me correct that the welterweight division is stronger than heavyweight. You can't deny that otherwise Fury's ranking is utterly meaningless. Fact.
    Ok the Welterweight division is more competative where no one is really much better than the rest I agree with you.

    My whole point of starting posting in this pointless thread is to point out the blatantly obvious that Tyson is better than Brook as is backed up by indipendant rankings and makes a mockery of all your bitter biased opinions.
    Before the Wlad fight Fury was higher in the rankings? Was Wlad better then Fury all the way until he lost to him? The boxrec rankings mean fuck all. Sure they dont have Gonzalez or Inoue in their top 20
    To be the best you have to beat the best which in Britain Tyson is the only fighter to do so.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How many times should World Champions fight?
    By iamasadlittleboy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-17-2011, 08:35 AM
  2. Real World champions who were British and number 1
    By Dark Lord Al in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 11-03-2010, 10:05 AM
  3. Met two (former) world champions tonight
    By HerbM in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-26-2010, 01:50 AM
  4. Worst champions of all time ?
    By Hughesd in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 03:51 PM
  5. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 11:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing