
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise

Originally Posted by
CutMeMicK

Originally Posted by
Puya

Originally Posted by
CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase.

It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve S***. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his a** to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it.

#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did.

#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that.

#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
Bookmarks