Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote Originally Posted by Puya
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.

Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase.
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve S***. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his a** to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it.
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did.
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that.
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
I can do numbers.

#1. Homie is just a saying. I didn't think you would actually flatter yourself into thinking I considered you one.
#2. I got wait 24 hours.
#3. Boxing Rec is where you got his last opponents name. I don't need to use it. And Castillo was defending his title against an undefeated fighter. His opponent was 7-0, not 2-4. Not only that, Nashiro was not an unknown. He had been hype since his amateur days by the Japanese writers. But you wouldn't know that, cuz it doesn't say so on Boxing Rec, right?
#4. Nobody complained cuz everybody pretty much knew Hatton wasn't going to keep the the title. Still I don't remember anybody pushing for Hatton-Urkal, either
#5. He fought Tszyu. So what? That was like 6 years ago. And at 140. What's that got to do with him being worthy to fight for a title at 147?
#6. You don't really want me to name all the welterweights better than him, do you?
A. Be a leader not a follower (I'll switch to letters now)
B. Me consider you my homie You called me homie I didn't call you homie. But OK.
C. I got Remirs name from the fight, saw it on the net think it was mediazone.com. So being 7-0 is something special now? I didn't know that.
D. So becasue a fighter is hyped, it makes him better then someone who isn't? Something else I didn't know, damn! you sure do know a lot.
E. No I didn't know that about Nashiro, because I don't follow amateurs. It's bad enough trying to keep track of one pro. division, I just let them get here to the pros. I could give a rats a** what they did as amateurs. All that is out the door once they turn pro.
F. Right EVERYBODY knew, Hatton was gonna let go of the belt. S***! then by any chance do you know the wining numbers to the Lotto?
G. Everybody has a fight lined up. Pretty much, he doesnt and hes ranked among the best.
H. You don't have to name me the fighters you think are better then him. I know them my self but they are all lined up for a fight already.
Tell me you don't sound foolish.

CMM: Why Cotto-Quintana get to fight for the 147 belt Hatton gave up?
VD: I think it's a good fight, if not them. Than who?
CMM: Well what about Urkal? Why he getting shafted?
VD: Cuz he don't deserve it
CMM: What? He's the mandatory.
VD: Homie, I don't
CMM: We ain't homies
VD: Like I was saying, MICK. I don't care what he is. He ain't worthy. His last opponent was 2-4 and still lasted the distance.
CMM: That's cuz he ran all night. Don't mean he wasn't good.
VD: Who's not good?
CMM: Urkal's last opponent
VD: What's his name?
CMM: Uh? Hold on, let me check boxing rec. Andrei Rimer. Yeah, that's it. He's good.
VD: He was 2-4
CMM: Don't mean he not good
VD: Urkal has almost 40 fights. What the hell is he doing fighting someone who's 2-4?
CMM: Uh, Uh. Urkal fought Tszyu. And Harris
VD: And lost to them. What's your point?
CMM: That Urkal should get the title shot
VD: Cuz he fought Tszyu 5 years ago. At a diffrent weight?
CMM: Yeah
VD: I see
CMM: Plus everybody better already fighting, so Urkal should get the fight
VD: So that's the way it works
CMM: What's wrong with that
VD: It's stupid
CMM: Not it's not
VD: Yes it is
CMM: NO IT'S NOT! I'M TELLING SADDO
VD: Go ahead. I'll be shocked if he thinks Urkal deserves a title shot
CMM: Saddo is my friend
VD: I'm sure he is. Later Mick


classic, cc in 24