Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast
Results 181 to 195 of 212

Thread: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

Share/Bookmark
  1. #181
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Well you better tell that to the BBBOC they have a misprint in their rules!

    You do realise British fights are officiated differently to world organistion fights? Its on,y been recently that British fights werent decided by the ref!

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    when a Boxer is supported on the ropes of the boxing ring and, in the opinion of the Referee, is unable to defend himself
    I take that to mean that he is supported on the ropes therefore remove the ropes and the boxer will go down as there is nothing supporting him

    occurs when the referee stops the action and gives an eight-count to a boxer who has not been knocked down but appears hurt.
    I take that to mean that he has not gone down he is still standing unsupported but he is trouble

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    What are you arguing over? Its there in black and white!

    In fact ill cut out everything other that what shows you that 8 counts still exist.

    In this Regulation 3.32, “down” shall mean one or more of the following:-
    when a Boxer is supported on the ropes of the boxing ring and, in the opinion of the Referee, is unable to defend himself;
    The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.

    So if a ref can stop a boxer and not permit him to box for 8 seconds while the boxer is on his feet what do you think that is?

    A tea break?
    Last edited by ross; 03-30-2016 at 02:08 AM.

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    What are you arguing over? Its there in black and white!

    In fact ill cut out everything other that what shows you that 8 counts still exist.

    In this Regulation 3.32, “down” shall mean one or more of the following:-
    The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.
    Wipe those tears Ross I'm not arguing, merely pointing out the difference between the rule

    The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.
    A standing 8 count is given if the boxer does not get knocked down, at no point does anything other than his feet touch the canvas

    it may seem like nit picking but they are 2 different rules in my opinion, just spotted that you said 'what shows you that 8 counts still exist' we are talking about the standing 8 count, not the 8 count following a knock down

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Its like educating pork.

    The "8 count following a knockdown" as you say has always been in place. The description of when a fighter is down is very ambiguous and for the ref to inteperet. The 8 count is clearly there though and while standing so that means I win!

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    I don't see what is all that ambiguous about the rules that you were strictly quoting just a few posts ago, in fact I would say that the description of when a fighter is down is pretty clear cut

    3.32.1 In this Regulation 3.32, “down” shall mean one or more of the following:-
    (a) when a Boxer falls from the boxing ring beyond the ring apron as a result of a legitimate blow; or
    (b) when a Boxer is on one foot or both feet and at the same time any other part of his body is touching the floor of the boxing ring; or
    (c) when a Boxer is supported on the ropes of the boxing ring and, in the opinion of the Referee, is unable to defend himself; or
    (d) when a Boxer is in the act of rising
    I would say that is when a fighter is down.
    End of the day it appears that you were arguing about a completely different rule to what Fenster mentioned in the first place.

    But then what do I know I just watch fights at home and have never taken a punch after all

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    945
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Lads lets stop arguing of course this brings up some strong feelings on this fight, we can not change
    the fact Nick Blackwell got injured, we could blame ref corner men doctors etc a boxing match is
    fight between two adults that are at peak fitness and in controlled environment(RING) with a referee
    and Doctors and other medical experts at ringside.
    I don't believe anybody is thick with there opinions, you say it as you see it and there are disagreements
    remember lads who needs our prays and good wishes is Nick Blackwell and family and spare a thought for
    Eubank Jr how he is feeling not to good lads.
    Last edited by Dia bando; 03-30-2016 at 03:09 AM.

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    The walking brain dead posts the rules that proved me right but - as Batman showed - is too thick to interpret them.

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Normally when a ref sees a fighters head snap back they stop the action and give an 8 count.
    Complete and utter imbecile.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Yes you are Fenster. Your posts are getting worse and worse.

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,331
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    750
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    The walking brain dead posts the rules that proved me right but - as Batman showed - is too thick to interpret them.

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Normally when a ref sees a fighters head snap back they stop the action and give an 8 count.
    Complete and utter imbecile.
    I'm quite enjoying this.

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    My posts are getting worse to you because i'm giving you a slap. Why should I put up with your rubbish? If I want to correct you I will. Simple as.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    You havent corrected anything. You saw that 8 counts are still in the BBBOC rules courtesy of me having to put you straight. Slap? Thats probably as much as you have in you

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    955
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1154
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    You havent corrected anything. You saw that 8 counts are still in the BBBOC rules courtesy of me having to put you straight. Slap? Thats probably as much as you have in you
    Let it go.

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Been watching Disney you nugget?

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,065
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nick Blackwell vs Chris Eubank Jnr

    Ross you do understand that you are providing an 'answer' to a question that hasn't been asked right?

    Only just watched the fight. Hindsight is a wonderful thing and given what happened of course I understand that people would have liked to see the fight stopped earlier, for me though, the fight ran it's natural course. Blackwell was a league below Eubank and it showed throughout but he was as hard as nails and always game, he always gave the referee justification for letting him go on. The amount of claret on show made it look a far more brutal affair.

    Jnr looked good, strong, bags of energy, good variety. I've never thought he wouldn't beat BJS in a rematch so no change there. Golovkin? Different gravy.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Eubank Jr-Blackwell - March 26th/Wembley Arena
    By Fenster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-13-2016, 02:58 AM
  2. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 11-17-2015, 04:53 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-07-2012, 06:43 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-24-2006, 09:23 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 01:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing