You should laugh at him for being such a fat ass! That's what I would do.

I do think Canelo has a slightly better resume I guess, definitely don't think he's as good as Crawford as a pound for pound fighter, which it part of what makes the debate so silly in the first place. I personally think you always have to do the eye test and try and go by recent form, but how can you compare guys who fight at completely different weights if you can't even agree on the criteria for it within a given one?