Donald Trump blows away the whole field: Hillary next!!

[Beanz]

In the past I would have been surprised by Miles and Brockton supporting Trump but you have to have some consistency and credibility for it to be blown away and they have none. Zero. Big fat nothing and even less empathy. Shocking really to get behind such a foolish spoilt brat and then pretend that he is some kind of savior. CORPORATIONS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and he is head of a huge one. CORPORATIONS DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO and he already does that. ......and yet he is supposedly the alternative? The other choice? talk about hoodwinked. Meanwhile the media etc all go go all out on not braodcasting protests etc from the far left and block coverage of Saunders and Corbyn and then Trump the ultimate Celebrity, reality TV star Facebook generation dumb arse is lauded as the answer. Trump is the ultimate smoke and mirrors example of how people are fooled by image and rhetoric and are not really interested in policy or content. They just like to have their egos stroked and ears warmed. A vote for Trump seems like a vote not only for more of the same but more x 100.

[SlimTrae]

In the past I would have been surprised by Miles and Brockton supporting Trump but you have to have some consistency and credibility for it to be blown away and they have none. Zero. Big fat nothing and even less empathy. Shocking really to get behind such a foolish spoilt brat and then pretend that he is some kind of savior. CORPORATIONS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and he is head of a huge one. CORPORATIONS DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO and he already does that. ......and yet he is supposedly the alternative? The other choice? talk about hoodwinked. Meanwhile the media etc all go go all out on not braodcasting protests etc from the far left and block coverage of Saunders and Corbyn and then Trump the ultimate Celebrity, reality TV star Facebook generation dumb arse is lauded as the answer. Trump is the ultimate smoke and mirrors example of how people are fooled by image and rhetoric and are not really interested in policy or content. They just like to have their egos stroked and ears warmed. A vote for Trump seems like a vote not only for more of the same but more x 100.

GB..............

[Gandalf]

Personally I was more into Bernie Sanders, but he was set up in a similar way to Ron Paul and so that was unfortunate. Maybe Clinton will still go to prison, but you know how the system is, so that is kind of unlikely. I like Sanders more than Trump, but think he is blinkered when it comes to the important issue of border controls. Trump against Sanders would mean I prefer Sanders.

That then leaves you the option of Clinton against Trump. It is far from ideal, but you know exactly what Clinton will do to the world with 'trade deals', war, and banks. In a situation like that you have to go with the person who wants to build manufacturing, close the borders, and have peace with Putin. Now does Trump flip flop and contradict himself? Yes. I also remember Obama keeping none of his promises, so expectations are low on all sides.

[ruthless rocco]

In the past I would have been surprised by Miles and Brockton supporting Trump but you have to have some consistency and credibility for it to be blown away and they have none. Zero. Big fat nothing and even less empathy. Shocking really to get behind such a foolish spoilt brat and then pretend that he is some kind of savior. CORPORATIONS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and he is head of a huge one. CORPORATIONS DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO and he already does that. ......and yet he is supposedly the alternative? The other choice? talk about hoodwinked. Meanwhile the media etc all go go all out on not braodcasting protests etc from the far left and block coverage of Saunders and Corbyn and then Trump the ultimate Celebrity, reality TV star Facebook generation dumb arse is lauded as the answer. Trump is the ultimate smoke and mirrors example of how people are fooled by image and rhetoric and are not really interested in policy or content. They just like to have their egos stroked and ears warmed. A vote for Trump seems like a vote not only for more of the same but more x 100.

GB..............

But Trump owned both the Miss America and Miss Universe pageants so he's fully qualified to be the leader of the free world.

[Spicoli]

Heeeeey look, look at my African American over there.

This has surpassed politics, Hillary has to do nothing but let the idiot talk. He is definitely one of the more dense uninformed candidates I've ever listened to.

[brocktonblockbust]

Heeeeey look, look at my African American over there.

This has surpassed politics, Hillary has to do nothing but let the idiot talk. He is definitely one of the more dense uninformed candidates I've ever listened to.

Common sense doesn't resonate with people anymore.

Sad world.

[Andre]

So you want this to rule over you?

Trump University Court Documents Make Clear that the GOP is Willingly Supporting a Fraud - Hit & Run : Reason.com

[brocktonblockbust]

So you want this to rule over you?

Trump University Court Documents Make Clear that the GOP is Willingly Supporting a Fraud - Hit & Run : Reason.com

No we want Hillary.

[brocktonblockbust]

In the past I would have been surprised by Miles and Brockton supporting Trump but you have to have some consistency and credibility for it to be blown away and they have none. Zero. Big fat nothing and even less empathy. Shocking really to get behind such a foolish spoilt brat and then pretend that he is some kind of savior. CORPORATIONS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and he is head of a huge one. CORPORATIONS DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO and he already does that. ......and yet he is supposedly the alternative? The other choice? talk about hoodwinked. Meanwhile the media etc all go go all out on not braodcasting protests etc from the far left and block coverage of Saunders and Corbyn and then Trump the ultimate Celebrity, reality TV star Facebook generation dumb arse is lauded as the answer. Trump is the ultimate smoke and mirrors example of how people are fooled by image and rhetoric and are not really interested in policy or content. They just like to have their egos stroked and ears warmed. A vote for Trump seems like a vote not only for more of the same but more x 100.

You and slim are so utterly wrong and have concocted arguments from cherry-picked and out-of-context information.
I.e. you have constructed arguments out of unsound inductive thinking, and faulty syllogisms.

@SlimTrae be careful, mate, he will lead you astray. BWAAAAMOO.MOO.MOO.MOO.MOOOO!

[SlimTrae]

In the past I would have been surprised by Miles and Brockton supporting Trump but you have to have some consistency and credibility for it to be blown away and they have none. Zero. Big fat nothing and even less empathy. Shocking really to get behind such a foolish spoilt brat and then pretend that he is some kind of savior. CORPORATIONS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and he is head of a huge one. CORPORATIONS DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO and he already does that. ......and yet he is supposedly the alternative? The other choice? talk about hoodwinked. Meanwhile the media etc all go go all out on not braodcasting protests etc from the far left and block coverage of Saunders and Corbyn and then Trump the ultimate Celebrity, reality TV star Facebook generation dumb arse is lauded as the answer. Trump is the ultimate smoke and mirrors example of how people are fooled by image and rhetoric and are not really interested in policy or content. They just like to have their egos stroked and ears warmed. A vote for Trump seems like a vote not only for more of the same but more x 100.

You and slim are so utterly wrong and have concocted arguments from cherry-picked and out-of-context information.
I.e. you have constructed arguments out of unsound inductive thinking, and faulty syllogisms.

@SlimTrae be careful, mate, he will lead you astray. BWAAAAMOO.MOO.MOO.MOO.MOOOO!

You've changed in the past year. Sorry whatever it is....
Concocting. ....while quoting republicans exclusively.

You ignore questions like a typical.conservative whose only resolve is insults.
My bad. I get it. Reasoning is irrelevant.

Cherry picked? That's just sad sorry...I quote Chump Trump on
Education
Taxation
Deportation
Minimum wage
Foreign policy
His stance on military
His position on planned parenthood/abortion
His religious views/lack thereof
His position on partisan parties (how often he changes)
His history/relationship with both Clintons
His position on Japan having nukes (for & against)
....meanwhile you speak on what Building a wall....but it's me and GB cherry picking...
Okay B....I will disengage. ..
You are right. I am the cherry picker.

[SlimTrae]

The word (conservative ) was once the platform to which Republicans based their principles on.

Notice....
How that word hasn't been used...since Daddy Rich got the nod.


Conservative talk show hosts nationwide are raising that question: One day after endorsing Trump..House Speaker Republican Ryan distances himself from Trump stating A Mexican can't try his case and be fair.....because Mexicans know. ..i will build a wall.

No need to quote liberals or mainstream media....just quote trump himself. ...and republicans. ...who apparently are now....ALL establishment Republicans.

[El Kabong]

Well to play Devil's Advocate....

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” - Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayer

We've been told that different life experiences leads to different "better" conclusions.

Also the law firm of Robbins Geller which was appointed by Judge Gonzalo Curiel as the attorney for the plaintiff in the Trump University case paid $450,000 for 2 speeches given by Bill and Hillary Clinton AND firm chairman Darren Robbins contributed a tidy little sum of $2,700 to Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign.

Also, if black people can be railroaded by the "Evil white justice system" then what is to keep a Hispanic Judge from railroading someone he might have a racial dislike of......or are we just saying that only white folks can be racist? (again this is JUST playing Devil's Advocate).



I mean if Hillary Clinton can escape jail for travelgate, White Water, etc then this Trump University business is not even a scandal.

[walrus]

I like many of the stupid things trump says, I find them refreshing, that's the only reason I like Biden. Having said that I do think this time Trump was a bit off on that comment and gave too much fodder for the press. The cycle may pass quickly, maybe Hillary will bark like a dog again and we can focus on that.

[SlimTrae]

Well to play Devil's Advocate....

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” - Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayer
(Okay, I said I wouldn't... But here I go...)

We've been told that different life experiences leads to different "better" conclusions.

Your point in devil's advocacy is IMO: understood. Myself I felt best to look at response(s) from Trump's team, not from my perspective.

Ryan calling his remark: textbook racism.
"I couldn't disagree more" From McConnell. ---- " I think it's inexcusable " Gingrich.----
"I don't condone his remarks"
---"Trump appeals to the racist tendencies in some people" Romney. --
" People keep asking me do I agree with Trump's comment on Curiel since I've endorsed him, he is making it hard on us". CorkerI

I am sure these individuals could've quoted Sotomayor as you did, but they didn't. As I now give my opinion...she is referencing an experience unique to Hispanic minorities. Asserting that when given the chance to rule, to lead: we must not do so with bigotry, malice, racism, that which we experience. We must rise above it. Neither of us know her intent, we can only give our opinion. Nothing greater.


Also the law firm of Robbins Geller which was appointed by Judge Gonzalo Curiel as the attorney for the plaintiff in the Trump University case paid $450,000 for 2 speeches given by Bill and Hillary Clinton AND firm chairman Darren Robbins contributed a tidy little sum of $2,700 to Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign.

IMO: excellent point you make. Conflict of interest? My take: 1. The case isn't the result of disgruntled Mexicans, rather predominately whites. 2. At the time, Trump was a Democrat... Who changed to not affiliated with any party. In 2012 what reason did Curiel have an axe to grind with a friend to Clinton's & had recently donated to Harry Reid? Last- Curiel reduced 40 plus states to just 3 in the lawsuit. That is in favor of Trump not plaintiffs-- nationwide claiming a 1,500 to $30 thousand gold plan became a money funnel. Wilder IMO is that the school folded in what? 2010? How is Curiel to blame for hearing this case? For the government pointing out he wasn't licensed as a university?

Also, if black people can be railroaded by the "Evil white justice system" then what is to keep a Hispanic Judge from railroading someone he might have a racial dislike of......or are we just saying that only white folks can be racist? (again this is JUST playing Devil's Advocate).

Sometimes playing devil's advocate is needed to see the other side, this being a good time for it. If there are examples you have of whites who have done to blacks that which you may suggest is being done to Trump, a white American, please cite. I could then agree with you that if you can name cases that blacks have lost due to racial dislike.... If you can name cases in which you, sir felt Hispanics lost due to racial dislike--- then I, too should be big enough to see the potential for a Mexican judge to rule bias against whites.

I mean if Hillary Clinton can escape jail for travelgate, White Water, etc then this Trump University business is not even a scandal.

We will have to agree to disagree. I don't have reason to compare political crimes to business crimes anymore than to compare rape crimes to pedophile crimes.
Allow me to respond to that separately.

[SlimTrae]

2 candidates are under investigation. It is my judgement to play advocacy on behalf of neither.

IMO it is just to detail both cases and not one for the other.

Clinton IMO is a person who had the audacity to funnel government info in a basement. Stupid at minimal, deceptive most likely.

The other candidate who told Americans he hand picked instructors to enrich their finances all for a nominal fee: $1500- to the $30 thousand..

Clinton: The review board led by Admiral Mullen & Ambassador Pickering presiding over 10 hearings/investigations (minimal)have given their conclusion on Clinton.
Is it not wise to discuss those in charge? To ask why Republican Kevin McCarthy stated his probe was political? From Congress to the advisory board, millions spent. And changed from what she did wrong in Ben Ghazi to what can we find as top secret in any emails about anything whatsoever.
I'm more inclined to speak on the majority Republican house & senate that as of 3-4 years later haven't found what conservative news has found :---Reason to incarcerate Clinton.
Now let us treat Trump fair- Let him prove Trump University students have no merit for what they claim...nationwide. And what do they claim? How is it not worthy of investigation from a business standpoint and how this gives a glimpse into his handling of business as potential POTUS.