Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
When you are suggesting that you are in a position to give the Queen's guard lessons on firearms you make yourself into a clown mate. Get over yourself. You are no better than Obama telling us what to do in the Euro referendum if you really believe what you have just typed. An armed soldier and a policeman are not the same thing.

I know that it's not a bright idea to point a loaded firearm at someone you're not willing to kill. Meaning, those guys pointing those firearms at tourists WERE ready to shoot and kill them for "standing on/touching a fence" and for touching a guard on the shoulder.....and you mocked and were outraged at the policeman who was being taunted in much the same manner as those guards for using a NONLETHAL DETERRENT.....and added to that, you call me a "clown"

Education and Training|NRA Gun Safety Rules
Firearms Safety | 10 Rules of Safe Gun Handling
The 4 Rules of Gun Safety – Concealed Nation

Thanks for the name calling.



I wouldn't know from guns Beanz I mean, who am I......just an American whose personalized smiley on this very site is .....but hell man, I don't know nothin' bout no bangsticks, I wouldn't even know how to plug one in.



LEO's (Law Enforcement Officers) and Military both take weapons training (well HERE they do) and so both ought to respect firearms and what they can do.








You DO understand that your line of reasoning boils down to "Well if the cop would have just pointed his gun at her then she would have stopped and everything would have been cool"....that is LITERALLY what you're saying by defending the Royal Guards and berating the actions of the officer, but hey what do I know, I'm a "clown"
Bullshit. Two different countries. Two different situations. Two different professions. Two different outcomes. Two different methods. You are drawing a parallel that is not there. If you think an on duty soldier wearing a bearskin defending and guarding a publicly restricted entrance as instructed by his superior military officers is the same as a camply bearded bear cop cowardly spraying pepper into a small unarmed woman's eyes in the good old land of the free is equivalent then there is no point trying to reason with you. This is a crap analogy you tried to use to bolster your crap argument. You can't then pretend that the crap analogy was my idea.

You are making yourself into a joke the more you retreat into refusing to use reason. You bemoan Obama telling the UK what to do and then try and give trained soldiers firearm lessons You bemoan anyone restricting your free access to firearms less the Government become tyrannical whilst defending government armed officers acting tyrannically. That officer is abusing his power to indulge in an assault and still you are defending him.

Not once have I suggested that the cop should pull his gun on anyone. He is a cop not a soldier (which ironically is what your insistence on arming yourselves has turned them into). Popping the inflatable would have protected his namby pamby likkle bonce from the big nasty bawoon, don't you think?