2 candidates are under investigation. It is my judgement to play advocacy on behalf of neither.

IMO it is just to detail both cases and not one for the other.

Clinton IMO is a person who had the audacity to funnel government info in a basement. Stupid at minimal, deceptive most likely.

The other candidate who told Americans he hand picked instructors to enrich their finances all for a nominal fee: $1500- to the $30 thousand..

Clinton: The review board led by Admiral Mullen & Ambassador Pickering presiding over 10 hearings/investigations (minimal)have given their conclusion on Clinton.
Is it not wise to discuss those in charge? To ask why Republican Kevin McCarthy stated his probe was political? From Congress to the advisory board, millions spent. And changed from what she did wrong in Ben Ghazi to what can we find as top secret in any emails about anything whatsoever.
I'm more inclined to speak on the majority Republican house & senate that as of 3-4 years later haven't found what conservative news has found :---Reason to incarcerate Clinton.
Now let us treat Trump fair- Let him prove Trump University students have no merit for what they claim...nationwide. And what do they claim? How is it not worthy of investigation from a business standpoint and how this gives a glimpse into his handling of business as potential POTUS.