Which fight is worse?

[Ron Swanson]

Oops, I forgot Garcia. Maybe him too.

Porter ices Garcia.

Certainly possible. I'm not high on Garcia. Not high on Porter either though. But Porter has absolutely no defense for the left hook. It's like he's completely blind to it. And with the way he rushes in blind he could get stopped. Broner dropped him with the left hook and Garcias hook is far better.

[Beanz]

Brook is a big welter and probably walks around at closer to 154. He isn't Nassem but he clearly has the potential to pile it on. He has much more ring sense than Khan and has real spite in his punches, he may go down fighting because his heart is certainly there, but I think Golovkin will be surprised how honest Brooks punches will keep him early doors. I can't see Kell having enough pop to keep GGG off down the stretch and it's very likely he gets stopped, but it's not a nailed on certainty, nothing ever is once they step through those ropes. It probably has as much to do with shutting Khan and the Eubank mouths shut for Kell and Hearn respectively as the wonga they will earn. Respect to Brook for stepping up without the diva bullshit and I see him giving a good account of himself despite losing and increasing his saleability on the world stage. Vargas claims and anyone else's of him bottling it will ring a bit hollow now.

[Master]

It is one thing to respect a fighter for taking on a challenge and another just taking the money and knowing full well he will lose and stand very little chance of winning. It is absurd to justify this fight, there is only one winner.

If I did another poll on who posters think will win all of you would choose GGG, (except Brock who is just "special").

[Ron Swanson]

What's lost in the comparison is we all knew Canelo was a fraud. We still held out hope for GGG

[Master]

What's lost in the comparison is we all knew Canelo was a fraud. We still held out hope for GGG

So true! I am disappointed in GGG for the first time and can not defend this defence.