Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 133

Thread: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,847
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3135
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    That is the point, the weight difference is too great and makes this fight a mismatch.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3148
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    So you think it's a mismatch, Master? Nobody would have guessed considering you've posted it a hundred times already. Boring cunt.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,433
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    788
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    What gets me, is it's funny how a fight can get made between Brook and GGG or Canelo and Khan, but a fight can't get made between For example, Brook/Khan or Brook/Thurman. It's a fucking joke really.
    They must think us fans are fucking stupid, and to be fair, we probably are putting up with this bullshit.
    Yeah, it's a fun fight, and I do think Brook has marginally more chance than Khan did against Canelo, but it doesn't mean to say that this sort of shit should be happening.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    yeah you know tho we should be happy


    brook Thurman - ace, im looking forward to that
    brook khan - good stuff, probly end up with khan on his back but a good fight for Britain
    brook GGG - fuck me!
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    it has a bit more of an affect, you know what I mean
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3148
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Yeah It's Golovkin fighting primetime in our country not Brook going over there. Big difference. I'm nerdy enough to watch press conferences, weigh-ins and what not, so will be glued to the build-up let alone the fight (regardless of the fact I think Brook is getting a hiding).
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1409
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    Kell has a few advantages in his favour. He is the quicker man with his hands. He has quicker feet. He has home advantage and he is abit younger.
    It would be nice to see how he would perform at 160 vs a fringe top 10 guy like a Curtis Stevens to see how he adjusts to the weight but he’s going straight in with a monster so if he loses it will be difficulty to tell if weight was to blame or if he was just out his league. I expect it will be a mix of the two.

    I reckon Eubank may have done better/survived longer but only because he is natural middleweight. Kell is the better fighter P4P but When I think back to his jelly legs vs sentence/gassing vs Jones and mauling with Porter it’s a big ask to jump up two weights and perform well vs Golovkin. Plus he is injury prone too so everything would have to fall in place like it didn’t for Calzaghe who had a similarly disappointing couple of years before the hype machine that was Jeff Lacy came across the Atlantic to challenge him. That made Joe and if Brook won this he’d be the hottest commodity in boxing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    Kell has a few advantages in his favour. He is the quicker man with his hands. He has quicker feet. He has home advantage and he is abit younger.
    It would be nice to see how he would perform at 160 vs a fringe top 10 guy like a Curtis Stevens to see how he adjusts to the weight but he’s going straight in with a monster so if he loses it will be difficulty to tell if weight was to blame or if he was just out his league. I expect it will be a mix of the two.

    I reckon Eubank may have done better/survived longer but only because he is natural middleweight. Kell is the better fighter P4P but When I think back to his jelly legs vs sentence/gassing vs Jones and mauling with Porter it’s a big ask to jump up two weights and perform well vs Golovkin. Plus he is injury prone too so everything would have to fall in place like it didn’t for Calzaghe who had a similarly disappointing couple of years before the hype machine that was Jeff Lacy came across the Atlantic to challenge him. That made Joe and if Brook won this he’d be the hottest commodity in boxing.

    yeah the Carson Jones fight was a shocker, I don't remember the jelly legs but he did get very tired very quickly
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1409
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    Kell has a few advantages in his favour. He is the quicker man with his hands. He has quicker feet. He has home advantage and he is abit younger.
    It would be nice to see how he would perform at 160 vs a fringe top 10 guy like a Curtis Stevens to see how he adjusts to the weight but he’s going straight in with a monster so if he loses it will be difficulty to tell if weight was to blame or if he was just out his league. I expect it will be a mix of the two.

    I reckon Eubank may have done better/survived longer but only because he is natural middleweight. Kell is the better fighter P4P but When I think back to his jelly legs vs sentence/gassing vs Jones and mauling with Porter it’s a big ask to jump up two weights and perform well vs Golovkin. Plus he is injury prone too so everything would have to fall in place like it didn’t for Calzaghe who had a similarly disappointing couple of years before the hype machine that was Jeff Lacy came across the Atlantic to challenge him. That made Joe and if Brook won this he’d be the hottest commodity in boxing.

    yeah the Carson Jones fight was a shocker, I don't remember the jelly legs but he did get very tired very quickly

    I meant to say the jelly legs vs senchenko ( not sentence, damn you auto correct)

    That's the only time I've seen brook wobbled and he came back to stop senchenko shortly after. If You've not seen it it's worth a watch just to see how kell reacts to getting hit.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I think Kells got a chance


    I really didn't think Khan had a chance but I think Kell has


    hes a very good fighter, if it wasn't for the weight difference id be screaming about his chances a lot louder
    Kell has a few advantages in his favour. He is the quicker man with his hands. He has quicker feet. He has home advantage and he is abit younger.
    It would be nice to see how he would perform at 160 vs a fringe top 10 guy like a Curtis Stevens to see how he adjusts to the weight but he’s going straight in with a monster so if he loses it will be difficulty to tell if weight was to blame or if he was just out his league. I expect it will be a mix of the two.

    I reckon Eubank may have done better/survived longer but only because he is natural middleweight. Kell is the better fighter P4P but When I think back to his jelly legs vs sentence/gassing vs Jones and mauling with Porter it’s a big ask to jump up two weights and perform well vs Golovkin. Plus he is injury prone too so everything would have to fall in place like it didn’t for Calzaghe who had a similarly disappointing couple of years before the hype machine that was Jeff Lacy came across the Atlantic to challenge him. That made Joe and if Brook won this he’d be the hottest commodity in boxing.

    yeah the Carson Jones fight was a shocker, I don't remember the jelly legs but he did get very tired very quickly

    I meant to say the jelly legs vs senchenko ( not sentence, damn you auto correct)

    That's the only time I've seen brook wobbled and he came back to stop senchenko shortly after. If You've not seen it it's worth a watch just to see how kell reacts to getting hit.

    yes I remember that, I might watch it again tho anyway
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who's next for Kell Brook??
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-18-2014, 10:28 PM
  2. take a bow Kell Brook
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-27-2013, 11:12 PM
  3. Kell Brook
    By Vendettos in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-22-2012, 08:35 PM
  4. Kell Brook
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-22-2011, 08:11 PM
  5. Kell Brook
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 07:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing