I think there's an apathy that has set in. Everybody knows boxing judges are incompetent... sort of like death and taxes. Too bad, though. Not wanting to go out on a limb here... but I suspect judging boxing matches is somewhat less complicated than biophysics. And there's plenty of those out there (biophysicists). So I imagine it's not a stretch to expect a multi-billion dollar sport like boxing to be able to come up with some competent boxing judges, so we don't have to suffer this eternal merry-go-round every time there's a big fight. The routine of it is nauseating. Big fight occurs... judging is abysmal... we all complain and wring our hands ('cause it's the only damn thing we CAN do)... we start talking about the next big fight and forget the bad judging we just saw. Wash... rinse... repeat.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote


I mean all three score are very individual but in many cases you have one where the judge was clearly busy over at the casino bar or in need of paying some bills
. Its almost an unfortunate time honored tradition to have blind judges either one at a time or as a whole. The obvious glaring problem with terrible judging is that there is almost always ZERO accountability, review or reprimand on a judge who cannot differentiate rounds. Judges are exactly like fighters in that they accumulate a record of performance and they need to be scrutinized as such before just being appointed. Know the names, make them stand ring center being introduced or even have them read it aloud at end. They stay in the shadows and that has to make it even easier to be blind or worse. We need a Teddy at every table to literally hold the score sheet in the face of a judge and commissioner and make them admit they were wrong on live tv. Again.

Bookmarks