Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 174

Thread: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,373
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    763
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Just for clarification I think Cruz is correctly the fav here. I gave him about a 55% chance of winning but the value is with Frampton with odds suggesting he just has a 28% chance of winning.

    I think Frampton will win the early rounds with Cruz finishing strong. Really could go either way but think you have to be mad to back Cruz at 1.4 or less.
    55% chance, 28% chance, it doesn't really matter does it ? at the end of the day , bets are only value if they are winning bets.
    Here's an example of what I mean. Floyd v Manny, Floyd was ALWAYS going to win that fight, so Manny was still always going to lose and it didn't matter if he was 4/1 or 20/1.
    Last edited by Primo Carnera; 07-27-2016 at 01:56 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    728
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Just for clarification I think Cruz is correctly the fav here. I gave him about a 55% chance of winning but the value is with Frampton with odds suggesting he just has a 28% chance of winning.

    I think Frampton will win the early rounds with Cruz finishing strong. Really could go either way but think you have to be mad to back Cruz at 1.4 or less.
    55% chance, 28% chance, it doesn't really matter does it ? at the end of the day , bets are only value if they are winning bets.
    Here's an example of what I mean. Floyd v Manny, Floyd was ALWAYS going to win that fight, so Manny was still always going to lose and it didn't matter if he was 4/1 or 20/1.
    For a once off bet the price doesnt matter because you cant prove whether you got value or not but over time its the only thing that matters. For example if I gave you 20/1 on a coin toss youd snap my hand off, but theres still a 50% chance you lose.

    Theres plenty of examples in sports where the Person that was always going to lose actually won. Leicester winning the premier league, Rahman beating Lewis, Douglas beating Tyson. Id hope the people who backed these werent happy with getting 1/10 on their bets

    Floyd was always going to win? Maybe not. He could have popped his shoulder when throwing his first punch. He could have buckled his knee. Anything can happen in the ring.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,373
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    763
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Just for clarification I think Cruz is correctly the fav here. I gave him about a 55% chance of winning but the value is with Frampton with odds suggesting he just has a 28% chance of winning.

    I think Frampton will win the early rounds with Cruz finishing strong. Really could go either way but think you have to be mad to back Cruz at 1.4 or less.
    55% chance, 28% chance, it doesn't really matter does it ? at the end of the day , bets are only value if they are winning bets.
    Here's an example of what I mean. Floyd v Manny, Floyd was ALWAYS going to win that fight, so Manny was still always going to lose and it didn't matter if he was 4/1 or 20/1.
    For a once off bet the price doesnt matter because you cant prove whether you got value or not but over time its the only thing that matters. For example if I gave you 20/1 on a coin toss youd snap my hand off, but theres still a 50% chance you lose.

    Theres plenty of examples in sports where the Person that was always going to lose actually won. Leicester winning the premier league, Rahman beating Lewis, Douglas beating Tyson. Id hope the people who backed these werent happy with getting 1/10 on their bets

    Floyd was always going to win? Maybe not. He could have popped his shoulder when throwing his first punch. He could have buckled his knee. Anything can happen in the ring.
    I know it's your job and fair play. But for every example you gave, there are 500 that go the other way.
    And as for maybe he could pop his shoulder, yeah maybe........ But he never did he?
    Like Master's old mate Beverley Knight once said, shoulda, woulda, coulda are the last words of a fool! 😉

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    693
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Don't overlook that 7" reach advantage

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    728
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Yes of course there are 100s of examples where things like that didnt happen. Hence why those fighters were such short prices for those fights. The point is anything can happen in the ring. If not noone would watch boxing, and people like you who can predict results with absolute certainty would bankrupt the bookies. Luckily you're not a betting man though!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,373
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    763
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Yes of course there are 100s of examples where things like that didnt happen. Hence why those fighters were such short prices for those fights. The point is anything can happen in the ring. If not noone would watch boxing, and people like you who can predict results with absolute certainty would bankrupt the bookies. Luckily you're not a betting man though!
    I don't mind a bet now and again, but I tend to prefer to win my bets. 😉

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    728
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Yes of course there are 100s of examples where things like that didnt happen. Hence why those fighters were such short prices for those fights. The point is anything can happen in the ring. If not noone would watch boxing, and people like you who can predict results with absolute certainty would bankrupt the bookies. Luckily you're not a betting man though!
    I don't mind a bet now and again, but I tend to prefer to win my bets. 😉
    Id take 1 winner and 99 losers at 500/1 ahead of 1 winner at 1/100

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,373
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    763
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Yes of course there are 100s of examples where things like that didnt happen. Hence why those fighters were such short prices for those fights. The point is anything can happen in the ring. If not noone would watch boxing, and people like you who can predict results with absolute certainty would bankrupt the bookies. Luckily you're not a betting man though!
    I don't mind a bet now and again, but I tend to prefer to win my bets. 😉
    Id take 1 winner and 99 losers at 500/1 ahead of 1 winner at 1/100
    Me too. But name me the last time you had a winner at 500/1 ?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Don't overlook that 7" reach advantage
    Or the volume. The volume and the height and reach are going to make the difference.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,078
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Definitely top notch matchup that you stand up for and think both will have major moments!Frampton can early and set traps on warming Cruz. One punch quickness is clearly in Frampton's favor. But ultimately Santa Cruz shows mostly an improved big frame boxer who can stay smart and has proven option to do massive volume head and body inside on Frampton forced to play aggressor more and more. Not a bad card at all..and Mikey Garcia is coming out of witness protection and fighting again Tevin Farmer looks a serious late bloomer and can make Redkach look like a statue. Card kicks off on Showtime extreme?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1337
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Carl Frampton v Leo Santa Cruz

    Good card, a few pick em fights with solid guys, what more can you ask for. Think it has to be said Frampton didn't impress anyone in his one fight in the states thus far, it's possible he doesn't travel well. If that's not the case, I could see just about anything happen, think a fight of two halves is quite likely.

    I see Paulie is fighting again against someone who also doesn't look to have any power, would really rather see him on the mic for this card, but it's his hometown and probably a safe fight so fair enough.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Frampton, Quigg, Santa Cruz, Rigo
    By Capt. Willard in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-15-2015, 12:57 AM
  2. Santa Cruz willing to go to Belfast to KO Carl Frampton
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-17-2014, 06:38 AM
  3. Team Frampton to make an outstanding proposal to Leo Santa Cruz
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-05-2014, 09:33 PM
  4. Santa Cruz-Carl Frampton on a collision coarse
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-12-2014, 10:42 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-26-2014, 10:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing