So in that case if they could not figure out a way to arrest him/her without killing them, but they could with this white man who actually killed an officer during a standoff while barricaded in a house.
And how do you explain how they did not kill this white guy who killed a Pennsylvania State Trooper and then went on the run for 48 days.
And how do you explain how this white guy — an Indianapolis police officer — who shot one of his colleagues and then led other officers on a chase until he was finally captured.
Or this white guy who opened fire inside a family restaurant in Louisville.
Or this white guy who stalked Portland, Oregon police for months and was finally arrested while parked outside a precinct station with a car full of guns and ammo.
Or this white guy in Idaho who killed a cop, went on the run, and then refused to come out of his hiding spot when police first cornered him.
Or this white guy who pointed a weapon at three New Orleans officers and told them to “drop your fucking guns.”
Or this white guy who shot up a movie theatre full of people and was arrested outside without a scratch.
Or this white guy who was walking around menacingly downtown in Louisville with an 18-inch knife.
Or this white guy who literally beat the crap out of two police officers before getting away.
All of them lived
But when Police came to get Korryn Gaines for minor vehicle and traffic violations (Yup. Baltimore Police going after the real hardened criminals) She had to die.
They had come to haul her out of her house in the presence of her child. They said she (Korryn Gaines) pointed her weapon at them (And I don't believe she did. They just said that she did) which is the
Yet the question remains : Let's just say Gaines pointed that gun at the officers, was their only recourse to fire upon her ?
Especially when they knew she had her five year old child close by ? Especially if they believed (rightly or wrongly based on previous encounters) that she may be dealing with some form of emotional or mental distress?
If they had decided instead to fall back, de-escalate the situation and perhaps try again another time to serve whatever warrant they were trying to serve, what would have been sacrificed by such a choice? Nothing really, but pride.
And that's what this about and a lot of these cases. They could not, would not, allow this black woman to win the day. Even for some minor infractions.
And what of Paul O’Neal ? Chicago police fired at his fleeing vehicle, in complete defiance of department policy, common sense and the law, then chased him, and when he exited the car on foot they proceeded to run him down and shoot him in the back as many as fifteen times.
He was unarmed, he posed no threat to the officers, and his death was of such little concern to them that even as his body lay on the ground they were giving each other high-fives, complaining about the inconvenience of whatever investigation might follow, and checking to make sure their body cameras were turned off.
Because to them, a dead black man is less important than whatever vacation days they might lose as punishment for his murder. And after all, he stole a car—a crime for which the punishment is not, I beg to remind, execution.
But for Gaines and O’Neal, police could not let them live. Because to do so would have been to allow Gaines and O’Neal (black people) to show them up, to put one over on them, to wound their fragile white ego.
And so they could not in either case extend to these two (And many others) the same treatment they gave to an entire group of white guys on the Bundy Ranch, who not only pointed guns at law enforcement, but promised to use them - and even to use the women on the ranch as human shields.
Now imagine what would have happened if several dozen of Korryn Gaines’s closest black friends had shown up at her house, armed and vowing to defend her against being arrested, all the while pointing guns at police?
The search for the perfect victim is impossible
Everyone has done something but in your case why even have trials? We should simply check to see if people arrested have a record already, and if so, pronounce them guilty on the spot or maybe even put a bullet in their heads, saving the state the expense of incarceration. No ?
But no you only hold out this standard for black people.
If police were to kill corporate executives or bosses who steal their employees’ wages by refusing to pay them for work done, or paying them less than the law requires, or cheating them out of overtime(and wage theft is a bigger problem, financially, than all the street robberies in the USA combined) according to the FBI. It is unlikely FOX News or you or anyone in Saddo would rush to rationalize the killing, by pointing the dirt they have done in the business world.
And yet you act stupid and prattle on about so-called “black-on-black” violence:
What about Chicago !! What about Chicago !! What about Chicago !! What about Chicago !!
But you must know that most of the black folks killed by other black folks likely had records ? Many were rival gang members.
So am I supposed to believe that white people suddenly care about non-angelic black people when killed by other black people ?


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks