Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Tell me which one has?
The only heavy who has tested positive for anything is Ortiz.Oh and Vitali years ago![]()
Array
Tyson didnt test positive, the others did you moron![]()
Roll your eyes until they fall out of your fool fucking head. Tyson Fury tested positive if he hadn't THIS Tyson Fury To Take On UKAD Over Drug Test Results - Boxing News wouldn't be a thing would it?
Yeah, that Fury boy looks like a REAL peach don't he? Just honest as the day is longTyson Fury: World heavyweight champion faces UK Anti-Doping charge - BBC Sport
This
"UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers (Tyson and Hughie Fury) were charged on 24 June, 2016 with presence of a prohibited substance."
and
This
"Tyson didnt test positive"
Are mutually exclusive statements meaning that they cannot both be right
Array
For fuck sakes they are both right!
He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.
Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career
Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko
If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks