Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
I thought you were better than this. Your like one of those "pactards" right now!
Its pitiful and where do you go from here? Klitschko will never get a win over Fury and I will always love that after all the crap you whiny little bitches spouted on here. Its suddenly turned in to a playground full of 6 year olds pulling each others hair and stamping their feet the closer a Tyson Fury fight gets![]()
Array
In all fairness Ross I kind of get the feeling that you are the one stamping and pulling hair whilst everyone else is winding you up purely for shits and giggles
OK ross, I'm just going to leave this here....
"In response to public comments made by Tyson and Hughie Furys' representatives, UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers were charged on 24 June 2016 with presence of a Prohibited Substance. Mandatory Provisional Suspensions were imposed pursuant to Article 7.9.1 of the UK Anti-Doping Rules.
The UK Anti-Doping Rules allow athletes to challenge the imposition of a Provisional Suspension and the independent National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) today lifted the athletesโ suspensions, pending full determination of the charges. These charges will be heard at a hearing before the NADP in due course.
UK Anti-Doping will not comment further on the case until due legal process has been completed."
And you can take from it what you will
Array
Again, very careful use of words and nowhere does it mention he failed a test because he didnt. The presence of blah blah blah not how much because if they said that they look like idiots.
You have failed to find any mention of a failed test by UKAD even though youv tried your hardest. Never mind. Just sit, sulk and wait for Wlads next loss![]()
Array
Seeing as Tony Thompson was mentioned as a boxer who had a delayed public know
Edge of a failed test I thought id point out as a comparrison that UKAD stated it was a failed test. They held back because he appealed. UKAD: Thompson Failed Drug Test After David Price KO - Boxing News
Tyson had trace amounts in an A sample that didnt fail. The B sample also passed and didnt have any traces of the same substance.
So your argument is "with presence of a Prohibited Substance" doesn't flat out say "failed test"......so you don't deny that the Fury's HAD contraband? Tyson just happened to have nandrolone just lying around the caravan did he?
If there was "no failed test" then why is Tyson Fury suggesting legal action, I mean if he hasn't failed a test what would there be to sue over?
But I leave that to you, boxing scholar, lawyer, giant asshole, ross
Array
Your struggling and im loving it! Soaking it all up! Its like im a poison to you girls
Why would you sue if someone tried defamng you...
How many more private messages must be sent about little old meI know...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks