Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Again, very careful use of words and nowhere does it mention he failed a test because he didnt. The presence of blah blah blah not how much because if they said that they look like idiots.

You have failed to find any mention of a failed test by UKAD even though youv tried your hardest. Never mind. Just sit, sulk and wait for Wlads next loss
So your argument is "with presence of a Prohibited Substance" doesn't flat out say "failed test"......so you don't deny that the Fury's HAD contraband? Tyson just happened to have nandrolone just lying around the caravan did he?

If there was "no failed test" then why is Tyson Fury suggesting legal action, I mean if he hasn't failed a test what would there be to sue over?


But I leave that to you, boxing scholar, lawyer, giant asshole, ross