Which fight is worse?

[erics44]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

[Primo Carnera]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.

[erics44]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.

yep very true


but brook GGG was more of a contest than the khan canelo fight


for a couple of rounds at least brook looked like he would make a fight of it

[Master]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.

yep very true


but brook GGG was more of a contest than the khan canelo fight


for a couple of rounds at least brook looked like he would make a fight of it

You could argue, on a neutral venue that Khan was winning his fight and won more rounds.

[erics44]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.

yep very true


but brook GGG was more of a contest than the khan canelo fight


for a couple of rounds at least brook looked like he would make a fight of it

You could argue, on a neutral venue that Khan was winning his fight and won more rounds.

I'm a khan fan and wanted khan to win but I don't think he won anything


It was like man against boy


and I thought kel was landing some solid hurtful shots and won the first two, and he had some success in 3 and 4

[Master]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

I have to agree with Eric that he had at least a share of other rounds. But I also have to be consistent and say, like I did in the Khan v Canelo fight, it's irrelevant who was winning on points, because it was never going to the cards.

yep very true


but brook GGG was more of a contest than the khan canelo fight


for a couple of rounds at least brook looked like he would make a fight of it

You could argue, on a neutral venue that Khan was winning his fight and won more rounds.

I'm a khan fan and wanted khan to win but I don't think he won anything


It was like man against boy


and I thought kel was landing some solid hurtful shots and won the first two, and he had some success in 3 and 4

Moot point but Khan was in control whereas Brook was surviving from round 3

[Primo Carnera]

How was Khan in control? He was avoiding getting KO'd , but didn't everyone get the feeling it was just a matter of time? Furthermore , Khan came in so out of shape he was never gonna take it 12 rounds. There was only ever one conclusion , it began with K and ended in O! In control? No no no no no.

[Master]

he won the first, he landed a lot more punches, and solid shots


unless you count a wobble as the automatic loss of a round?

Yes, the wobble showed the impact of GGG's punches.