Show me "To save face".......survey says!!!!!Originally Posted by ross
Oh, I'm sorry, the correct answer was "as a result of a previously failed test".
Thicko
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 1
Likes: 50
Dislikes: 0
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
Show me "To save face".......survey says!!!!!
Oh, I'm sorry, the correct answer was "as a result of a previously failed test".
Thicko
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
"Hey Tyson, you did nothing wrong, but we want to have a hearing about that nandrolone that we DIDN'T find in that test you DIDN'T take" - The UKAD in the mind of ross
That's a special kind of stupid ross.....face it, YOUR BOY is a bum, he's a PEDs cheat and a cokehead....no wonder you like him.
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
According to big Dan, Fury did snort his way off the fight and might be stripped from his titles
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=2...097380878623-4
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
Dyson Fury
Moderator - Old Guard
Array
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
As somebody who works in a bank, I believe the traditional banker's celebration of bonus season in March is to faceplant a large bowl of cocaine. This means I cannot criticize Fury for being a complete and utter idiot.
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
NO! You're not a boxer and THAT'S why you cannot criticize Fury.
We all must read what ross has to say because ross is THE boxer on here and HIS opinion is the only one that matters.
Shah Khan
Array
Re: Fury v Wlad Off
ICB was an amateur boxer (or so he claims) that could spark out a p4p great because he swam a lot. These guys know what they're talking about.NO! You're not a boxer and THAT'S why you cannot criticize Fury.
We all must read what ross has to say because ross is THE boxer on here and HIS opinion is the only one that matters.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks