Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn


I give the edge to Pac-man he is stronger and younger and sense of ring wars as mentioned he has taken less abuse...I think this is a mistake for Manny in the long run...We all know Morales is fading...Other than money there is really not much to gain...He will always be known as a guy who beat a shot fighter ( some how that always ends up the case when one guy beats a legend)...IMO Pacquiao will or actually has been spending too much time with this trilogy....I see over confidence in the long run for him and it will lead to a loss for him....worse yet if Morales has one of those Just for one night moments and performs like he was in his prime years then Manny may get his due....After this is over pacquia should drop down and forget this nonsense....130 is not for him
Morales is not a shot fighter and if he beats Pacquiao it won't be cause it's one of those one night moments, it'll be just for the mere fact that he's better than Pacquiao, the third fight is necessary, Pacquiao won the second fight, but everyone is making it seem like if it was some walk in the park, i've been rewatching the first two fights everyweek for the last month and the fight wasn't a lopsided mismatch, Morales was winning early on, and then faded, most likely like everyone said due to conditioning, his skills were still there and he was still sharp, his heart and desire were still there, perfect example was when he tried to fire off combos while having his legs completely gone, everyone is writing him off and that's a huge mistake if Pacquiao's doing it as well, I'm going to back my boy up 100% but since both fights were so competitive and close (first fight had Morales winning 116-112, second at time of the stoppage had it 86-85 for Pacquiao) i think that both fighters need the fight to move ahead, and if Pacquiao deserved his rematch, why doesn't Morales?