They don't use carbon dating to test fossil bones as supposedly the bones are millions of years old.

Carbon dating is only accurate back to around 5000 years and can be used another 5000 or so years beyond that with caution.

When it comes calculating dates of millions of year they use other radiometric dating methods with the potassium/argon method being the most commonly used.

Of course the dates given by such methods can never be verified however when the dating methods are used on rocks that we know for certain how old they are they show themselves to be way off.

One example from Hawaai. Researchers tested a lava flow known to have taken place in 1800 using the potassium/argon method.

The rocks were dated using this method as being nearly 3,000 million years old, somewhat older than the actual 200 years.

Nowadays dinosaur bones are dated by the rocks that they are found in, and the rocks are dated by the animals that are found buried in them, a rather bizarre self perpetuating circular argument.

Furthermore actual research into geological processes in action today clearly falsify the evidence for evolution.

For example the Grand Canyon is supposed to be 2000 million years old, the result of erosion from the Colarado river.

Yet when Mt St Helens, a tiny little volcano erupted in 1980 it carved out a canyon over 100 ft deep and over 100 ft wide in a single afternoon. This is 1/40 th the size of the the Grand Canyon.

So if it took just a few hours to do that how hard is it to assume that similar catastrophic events could not have shaped the grand canyon itself in just a matter of thousands of years rather than the millions evolutionists imply?