Abdul Razak Aryan - Somali refugee ATTACKS 11, Ohio University

[TitoFan]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

[walrus]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

Don't do it guys that where it starts. A simple "oh yes I see" brings u down. Wipe those liberal rainbow tears from your eyes

[brocktonblockbust]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

Don't do it guys that where it starts. A simple "oh yes I see" brings u down. Wipe those liberal rainbow tears from your eyes

Agreed. These guys are trolls. "Good post Denilson" hahaha. Gandalf is miffed by our posts but supports the most flagrant, blatant, allowed-to-be-a-Saddo-member-even-when-being-a-militant-black-racist piece of shit. Hahaha. You just can't make this stuff up. Walrus it could be painkillers.

[TitoFan]

So the guy's not allowed to make any good points on any topic?

[Gandalf]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

Don't do it guys that where it starts. A simple "oh yes I see" brings u down. Wipe those liberal rainbow tears from your eyes

Agreed. These guys are trolls. "Good post Denilson" hahaha. Gandalf is miffed by our posts but supports the most flagrant, blatant, allowed-to-be-a-Saddo-member-even-when-being-a-militant-black-racist piece of shit. Hahaha. You just can't make this stuff up. Walrus it could be painkillers.

You are now calling a poster a piece of shit on the main boards? Then you accuse posters of being on drugs because they point out the hypocrisy of highlighting individual acts of violence whilst ignoring the full picture of how terrorism is created? No you couldn't make it up could you? Is there anything in Denilsons post you actually want to critique?

[El Kabong]

So denilson, you're saying all Americans are fair game because of American foreign policy which we, the individual citizens don't directly control?

Then I guess I should not care about ANY "innocent Muslims" caught in the crossfire. I mean if I a normal civilian am fair game and it's us or them all I have to say to that is:


Well....bye

[TitoFan]

Terrorism is reprehensible in either direction, because innocent civilians die. Denilson's point, which is similar to points Miles has made in the past, is that the U.S. is not blameless in these things, as a lot of the military strikes, whether it be drones or whatever.... kill a lot of innocent civilians as well. The point is the U.S. does stick its nose where it doesn't belong. Ideally, if you get down to it, the U.S. should limit itself to defending its own borders and people. That line that gets crossed whenever the U.S. takes on the role of global policeman is a very dangerous line to cross. It's common knowledge that a lot of U.S. actions abroad (in the name of global peace-keeping) are really driven by financial interests. That's not a good enough reason. So naturally there's a backlash. It doesn't make it right, and terrorists are the worst kind of people, worthy of the worst type of treatment when caught. But other countries can and will get pissed off.

[brocktonblockbust]

So denilson, you're saying all Americans are fair game because of American foreign policy which we, the individual citizens don't directly control?

Then I guess I should not care about ANY "innocent Muslims" caught in the crossfire. I mean if I a normal civilian am fair game and it's us or them all I have to say to that is:


Well....bye

Lyle, Lyle. Time to <BLOCK> some idiots.

<BLOCK> Miles
<BLOCK> Denilson

Ahhhhh..... Pure pleasure.

Ahhhhhh!

[brocktonblockbust]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

Don't do it guys that where it starts. A simple "oh yes I see" brings u down. Wipe those liberal rainbow tears from your eyes

Agreed. These guys are trolls. "Good post Denilson" hahaha. Gandalf is miffed by our posts but supports the most flagrant, blatant, allowed-to-be-a-Saddo-member-even-when-being-a-militant-black-racist piece of shit. Hahaha. You just can't make this stuff up. Walrus it could be painkillers.

You are now calling a poster a piece of shit on the main boards? Then you accuse posters of being on drugs because they point out the hypocrisy of highlighting individual acts of violence whilst ignoring the full picture of how terrorism is created? No you couldn't make it up could you? Is there anything in Denilsons post you actually want to critique?

He doesnt even deserve after calling for whites to be killed ..... Gandalf you are beyond ridiculous. The Rainbow Coalition has allowed a militant black racist to openly threaten whites for over a year now. And you want people to critique his post now?

[Gandalf]

Yeah Denilson.

You talk a lot of shit about racism, but you speak a lot of truths on terrorism.

Don't do it guys that where it starts. A simple "oh yes I see" brings u down. Wipe those liberal rainbow tears from your eyes

Agreed. These guys are trolls. "Good post Denilson" hahaha. Gandalf is miffed by our posts but supports the most flagrant, blatant, allowed-to-be-a-Saddo-member-even-when-being-a-militant-black-racist piece of shit. Hahaha. You just can't make this stuff up. Walrus it could be painkillers.

You are now calling a poster a piece of shit on the main boards? Then you accuse posters of being on drugs because they point out the hypocrisy of highlighting individual acts of violence whilst ignoring the full picture of how terrorism is created? No you couldn't make it up could you? Is there anything in Denilsons post you actually want to critique?

He doesnt even deserve after calling for whites to be killed ..... Gandalf you are beyond ridiculous. The Rainbow Coalition has allowed a militant black racist to openly threaten whites for over a year now. And you want people to critique his post now?

You said that soldiers should have their necks sliced open like rats so Denilson does not have a monopoly on extremist views. With that in mind you should probably be a bit more fair minded when it comes to the occasional silly thing Denilson might say. His post was an interesting one.

[vidgil]

As individuals we all have our own hardships and tragedies - some obviously a lot more than others.

But there's no amount of injustice that you can suffer, either as an individual or as a group, that justifies acting like a murderous savage. There's no need for "but (x) did this" conversations.

This Abdul guy was a murderer, a piece of shit. Those who commit war crimes in the middle east are murderers (but a distinction between war and war criminal must be made).

To argue about who did what to who is irrelevant: a man who chooses to purposely kill innocent civilians is a savage, regardless of his color or religion. Let's call a savage a savage and move on.