Hey Fenster,

It's a funny sort of logic you have if you believe that ancient man was capable of digging up and reconstructing fossils, and perfectly recreating what they would have looked like, but were dumb enough to also believe that these creatures still actually existed and so made up their stories of encounters with them.

The word 'tanninim' literally means monsters in Hebrew, so whenever this word is used in the bible it is saying monsters,

The bible describes two in detail, the Leviathan and the Behemoth. There is much controversy over whether these two descriptions are actually dinosaurs and I myself am not convinced either way I merely mention them to show that there are indeed references to monsters in the bible, so the question, 'Why are there no dinosaurs in the bible', is easily answered. There are clearly references to monsters in the bible.

Interestingly for those of you who think all dinosaur finds are fossil contained in rock layers, do a google search for 'fresh dinosaur bones' or 'unfossilised dinosaur bones' and you will be quite suprised. A number of dinosaur bones have been found now that are not even fossilised! They have even found traces of what looks like red blood cells in the bones of a T Rex, cells which should die within a couple thousand years.

Here are some examples

In 1987, while working with scientists from Memorial University (Newfoundland, Canada) on Bylot Island, just east of the northern tip of Baffin Island, a young Inuit (Canadian Eskimo) picked up a bone fragment. It was identified within days as part of the lower jaw of a duckbill dinosaur and proclaimed to the world as such.1

The story was different however in north-western Alaska. In 1961 a petroleum geologist discovered a large, half-metre-thick bone bed. As the bones were fresh, not permineralized, he assumed that these were recent bison bones. It took 20 years for scientists to recognize duckbill dinosaur bones in this deposit as well as the bones of horned dinosaurs, and large and small carnivorous dinosaurs. Presently William A. Clemens and other scientists from the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Alaska are quarrying the bone bed.2


Do a google search on Mary Schweitzer, an expert paleontologist who reported finding what looked like red blood cells in the bones of a T Rex. She is a world renowned paleontologist and one of the first to use modern biological methods in the study if fossilised dinosaur bones.

Her discovery of red blood cells in the bone fragments of a T Rex caused shock waves around the evolutionary world. It is interesting and extrememely bizarre however that evolutionists have interperated this evidence not as evidence that dinosaurs did not live 65,000,000 years ago but rather that Scweitzer has discovered an entirely new form of fossilization process hirtho unknown.

Please, anybody who wishes to actually debate this stuff, do some basic research so that you have at least some understanding of the issues involved and do not merely respond by sying such stupid statements as 'I'm right and you're wrong'

I am only interested in actual scientific evidence and have throughout presented evidence to support my viewpoint. So far nobody has put forward a shred of evidence to support evolution.