yea besides the fact that the fight took place at 135, and he would do the same thing to Pacquiao, and you're trying to boost up Pacquiao to be the greatest fighter, yet bring him down with your own stupidity, if Morales is such an old man as you put it, and if him and Barrera both suck as bad as you say, why should his victories over either of them matter anything, i mean you've said yourself, they are would of been greats, so that means that Pacquiao is nothing but an old man beater, and that he hasn't had any real big wins either.
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: 
Re: MORALES A GREATER FIGHTER THAN BARRERA? (yes imo)
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
yea besides the fact that the fight took place at 135, and he would do the same thing to Pacquiao, and you're trying to boost up Pacquiao to be the greatest fighter, yet bring him down with your own stupidity, if Morales is such an old man as you put it, and if him and Barrera both suck as bad as you say, why should his victories over either of them matter anything, i mean you've said yourself, they are would of been greats, so that means that Pacquiao is nothing but an old man beater, and that he hasn't had any real big wins either.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks