Creation vs Evolution

[Kev]

I'm still waiting for someone to present a case for creationism.

Actually english is more expressive simply because it contains more words, it has absorbed from many cultures rather than isolating itself.

I'd also like to know what site bilbo is ripping all this nonsense from.

I'll tackle one of those dodgy carvings for you that you presented as evidence You are seeing what you want to see to suit you're thinking. Anyone seen a newt? you know those pre-historic lizard looking types with a tale and a ridged back..................

Hey Missy, unfortunately I don't think you would ever be convinced no matter what evidence was put before you. You already reject the idea of a creator so cannot see the evidence before you without looking at it through evolutionary eyes.

show me the evidence for a creator. All you're doing is ripping in to one theory without any evidence for your own. Mong.

Tell you what, the idea that that 'picture' is actualy another sort of lizard, hence a newt or Komodo dragon are much more likely than the nonsence you're coming up with.

Actually evidence against evolution IS evidence for a creator. If the fossil record clearly shows that no animal or plant species shows any evidence whatsoever of gradual evolution then the only other possible explanation is that these creatures first appeared on earth instantly and fully formed, i.e either created instantly or brought here in their completed forms from outer space.

The fact that it has been proven countless times that it is biologically impossible for life to arise from non life means that life itself is a miracle to a science. There is no way life could have evolved from lifeless matter.

This means either, life was created by some supernatural force or else aliens planted life here. However if the answer is aliens we are still left with the problem of how did they evolve from a cold lifeless universe as well.

The only plausible answer seems to be that the origins of life arose from some intelligent force outside of the universe.

Again I quote Sir Arthur Keith, a world renowned physical anthropologist and anatomist, who was also a staunch believer in evolution.

He said the following

Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation which is unthinkable

Regarding your dinosaur question. This is a stegasaurus



This is a newt



This is what is on the wall at Angkor Wat



If you honestly think that looks more like the newt than the stegasauros then I would say you are beyond convincing.

By the way, a newt appears on the exact same pillar as the stegasauros.

Please actually follow this link that I provided earlier and scroll down. You will see a host of animal carvings that the people of Ankor Wat carved, all of them instantly recognisable and anatomically correct, including a newt or lizard


http://khmer.cc/community/t.c?b=1&t=2667