This article says that the cost to the NHS isn't that significant overall, but I don't know how they even reach the numbers they do. My thinking would be that if I was Romanian and had a serious condition, it would be more sensible to seek treatment in the UK rather than Romania. In a situation like that you could see how the UK would end up footing the bill and treatment in the UK would be much more than it is in Romania too. Then in the article the doctor mentions treating people outside of the EU for what amounts to tens of thousands of pounds. That's a lot of money! I wonder when it became the UK's responsibility to treat everyone? That's where for people not vested in the system, there should be better checks and balances. It seems very strange.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...overnment-cuts
Obviously the big problem with the NHS is that it has 40% less beds than in the 1980's. That is clearly a bit bonkers. There was a recent article saying that patients are having surgery cancelled just days before because beds are not available.
Bookmarks