Khan is a complete cunt! He's never wanted the fight and wanting a 70% cut is just a way of squirming out of it.
I couldn't give a flying fuck if it happens or not.
Khan is a complete cunt! He's never wanted the fight and wanting a 70% cut is just a way of squirming out of it.
I couldn't give a flying fuck if it happens or not.
Who are you fellas talking about? One of the names seems familiar, think I heard of this Brooks chap giving 100 reasons he shouldn't have to fight Spence.
Didn't know Khan had demanded 70% - if true then yep , it's him that doesn't want it
Cock
Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate
has khan got a point though
yeah he sounds like a bellend saying he is the a side and all of that
but say they both faced opponents of the same standing in their next fights, what kind of money would they both generate?
I dunno, id have to see some figures for the fight and for other options to really decide if kell is getting a good deal or not
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Khan generates money because of his weak chin - even in a fight on paper that looks one sided the other guy always has a chance
But his prime days are over
Kell has been stopped once whilst still on his feet with a fucked up eye.
Can't see how anyone can argue this shouldn't be 50-50
Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate
in terms of boxing standing/ability/potential yes it deserves 50-50
maybe even more in kell's favour
but khan generates more money, why should he give some of that up? he has fought better fighters and has more fans
and his weak chin does contribute but also his race and his background
if he was fighting a journeyman would he give him half the proceeds?
I know kell is a long way from that, but as you step up the money generating ladder, does kell reach the kind of heights that khan does? therefore should kell only be worth the amount of money he attracts?
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Neither can Get the same pay day without the other. This will be huge over here.
If you were Brook would you accept less than half.
Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate
I don't disagree that if Brook fights at 147 he should have to fight Spence and that's it. My view was based on the thread and Khan wanting 70%.
Btw, surely you recognise this "Brooks chap" Ron? He's the one that beat America's new "Mini Mike Tyson" in his own back yard and destroyed that little myth. Admittedly that was a while ago, but that's because Garcia and Thurman have been lining up bums between them and avoiding coming here to fight him despite the fact that they would've been guaranteed more money.
I agree that this is getting out of hand and the best should fight the best, but what can you do when someone as influential as America's Golden Boy is allowed to let fights marinate and make fights at 6 ounces above or below a weight limit so as not to lose a title. Come to think of it, didn't Garcia do that as well? Fuck , it's a stateside epidemic!!!![]()
So USA is to blame for what Mexicans and Puerto Ricans do? Love it!
Reminds me of how Ukrainians respond to Russians who blame Obama for every problem in Russia "yeah, it's Obama pissing in your halls" haha
147 seems to be the epicenter of the problem that permiates the whole of the sport. Everyone has a reason why they shouldn't fight another guy. Of course Thurman wanted Garcia, every top fighter at 147 wanted Garcia. Of course Kell wants Pacquiao or Khan, money money money money. I don't think Spence is some boogeyman, I don't believe in any of the guys that get that rep. Some are good, some are really good, some are over hyped. In the end it comes down to money. If it pays enough they get fights. But part is fighters need to get back to being fighters. It has been proposed for over a year now that Kell would give up his belt when it is time to fight Spence. There is no way Kell has not heard this. If he gives it up it is a bad bad look.
I don't give two shits about a Khan/Brook matchup. I want to see top guys determine who is best. Khan/Brook does nothing to determine this. Brook/Thurman/Spence all need to fight each other. Even if each finishes 1-1 the sport is better off.
It's funny how easy it is to become a legend in this sport and nobody seems to want to follow the simple path. The UK had that era at 168, all they had to do was fight each other and now we will remember them forever. Over here we had the 4 horsemen, all they did was fight each other. Imagine these guys now fight each other twice now, does anyone think they don't come out ahead for it? Go 1-3 and you will still be better for it. Makes the sport extremely frustrating. Because we will be lucky to see these guys fight once. (SMDH)
Although I'd love to take credit for it....
https://roberto00.wordpress.com/2011...weight-fights/
Khan is being smart.
Let Brook fight Spence first and see what happens.
Let's see if Spence is everything that he's made up to be..
Should be 60-40 in khans favour..Khan has fought far better competition.
We'll gloss over the Mexican Puerto Rican thing otherwise we'll be here all night , but you're all happy to have the star spangled banner played when Oscar won Gold and call Swift an American champion.
As for the rest of your post, I 100% agree, couldn't put it better myself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks