Again missy, if you actually bothered to follow any of my links you will have seen the Ankgor Wat lizard carvings which actually look exactly like lizards.

Also there bear carvings, baboon carvings, parrot carvings, swan carvings all look exactly like the animals they are supposed to be.

The 'stegasaurus' looking creature does not look even remotely like a newt or crested lizard, actually the majority of skeptics have dismissed the 'stegausaurus' as being a rhino despite the presence of spiky plates all along its back like a stegasuaurus and a long tail like a stegasaurus

And whilst we are on the subject I printed 4 examples of dinosaurs being seen by man. do you think the other 3 were newts as well?

Plus you still havn't addressed the fact that evolutionists themsleves admit that there is no evidence whatsoever for evolution have taken place to be found in the fossil record.

I'm clearly attempting to have a dialogue with somebody who has not the slightest understanding of evolution beyond 'knowing' that it is true becuase they teach it in schools and put it on the telly.

This quote may interest you, although I doubt it.

Evidence from fossils now points overwhelmingly away from the classical Darwinism which most Americans learned in high school.

That is an official evolutionist statement printed in Newsweek after the international Evolutinary convention in Chicago in 1980.

The offical report went to say

The missing link between man and the apes … is merely the most glamorous of a whole hierarchy of phantom creatures. In the fossil record, missing links are the rule. … The more scientists have searched for the transitional forms between species, the more they have been frustrated.

So straight from the evolutionists mouths themselves it is absolutely official and true according to evolutionists themselves that the theory of evolution as you understand it, were taught at school and is promoted in the media is now known to be untrue.

Don't misunderstand me, they still believe 100% in evolution just that all the evidence for it up until 1980 had been false. They now believe evolution works according to very different principles, most notably punctuated equilibrium rather than phyletic gradualism, and that this is why they can't find any evidence for it at all.

Again if you actually read any of the literature yourself you would see that I am correct.