Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  14
Likes Likes:  265
Dislikes Dislikes:  8
Results 1 to 15 of 705

Thread: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,153
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2021
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Listened to an Abel Sanchez interview this morning, he explained perfectly why the Jacobs rematch isn't happening - Money.

    However good a fight Jacobs gave Golovkin he lost and it did shit numbers. He said Jacobs needs to make a name for himself now, fight Lemiuex, fight another big name, make the money men demand the rematch as the people that fund fights are not currently interested.

    You can't argue with that.

    Fans don't like it - the divvies will call it a "duck" - but it's the truth. A plain simple fact in boxing is - the bigger the risk the bigger the reward, if that's not the case then the fight is not worth considering.
    One of the saddest posts I have ever read. Jacobs won by many peoples opinions. Not the majority, but many. He deserves a rematch. He's out there calling for a rematch. You can't just point to the numbers because the numbers were effected by the fact most thought it was a gimme fight. Proven by the 8/1 odds.

    Nobody sees a gimme anymore. It would absolutely get better numbers for part 2. Do you have the nerve to deny it would get better numbers? Please don't dodge the question, don't change the question. Do you think a rematch would get better/worse/same numbers? If you think, as any sane man would, it would get better numbers then the initial numbers are irrelevant.
    It would do very similar numbers. Maybe a bit more, maybe a bit less. Either way it wouldn't be a viable fight to make. HBO aren't buying as many fights as they used to and they're just not going to come up with the scratch again for a rematch. The numbers don't add up to make it a doable proposition. So that's that.

    If HBO offered Golovkin a twenty million dollar guarantee tomorrow to rematch Jacobs in his next fight Golovkin would snap their hand off. But instead they're offering him the chance to make that kind of money, more than he's so far earned in his entire career, fighting Alvarez, so that's what he's doing. Whichever fighter offers him the most money for his next fight after Alvarez is the fight he'll take. It's all about the benjamins baby.
    I'm not talking about instead of the Alvarez fight. After the Alvarez fight he should be looking at Jacobs. Of course if there's some PPV out there that is what to make. But who is a PPV? HBO has said they have interest in Jacobs NOW, his standing has gone up.

    If HBO have said they have interest in Jacobs now and want to make Golovkin-Jacobs two after the Alvarez fight then that's the fight Golovkin will take. If they want him to fight Lemieux then that's who he'll fight next. He's not ducking anybody. He's got a limited time left and he wants to make as much money as he can before it's all over for him. Intrinsic to the whole enterprise is HBO. They're putting up the lion's share of the promotional pot in every fight and occasionally for Golovkin there's a PPV possibility so he's going to do exactly what HBO want every time*.


    *Unless there's some big daft offer from somewhere else like when Kazakhstan, the greatest country in the world, made an offer to Golovkin to fight somebody in front of his own countrymen. Then they were thinking about fighting Saunders over there for a nice easy payday and then getting back on the HBO travelator. But the Alvarez fight came up so naturally they grabbed it as it could pay more than the entire rest of his career will.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Seems like most fans are talking like it's a foregone conclusion Golovkin wins, I thought Canelo would have at least a strong small group that fancied him (flomos/anti-white fighters don't count).

    Bookies don't have it far off a 50-50 fight.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Bear in mind Canelo was 21 when they sparred


    Doug Fischers report of the sparring

    https://www.ringtv.com/499961-gym-no...CUTCco.twitter
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,879
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,873
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    "Foregone conclusion" does it for me.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    "Foregone conclusion" does it for me.
    I think this fight will be a lot more competitive than many are seeing it.

    I don't really care too much for Canelo as I too think he took his time getting to GGG. But I do disagree with the double standards afforded to others.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,873
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin-Canelo OFFICIAL!!!- Sept 16th. (Apologise to Fishnets. Cretins) Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    "Foregone conclusion" does it for me.
    I think this fight will be a lot more competitive than many are seeing it.

    I don't really care too much for Canelo as I too think he took his time getting to GGG. But I do disagree with the double standards afforded to others.

    Oh it'll be competitive for awhile. As much as I can't stand Ginger's hype machine and Ginger's doting, fishnets-wearing promoter, Canelo isn't going to be the stationary target Junior was for him. It'll be a fan-friendly fight for as long as it lasts. Eventually GGG will cave him in, and it'll be over. Just saw in The Fight Game where Oscar was quoted as saying this was the biggest fight in boxing history. Good thing Max Kellerman was there to dump the ridicule on the comment that it deserves.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Moving on...Canelo vs Kirkland vs Cotto vs Golovkin
    By Boxer4life in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 05-11-2015, 02:20 AM
  2. Kazuto Ioka and Ryo Miyazaki back in action Sept 16th
    By boxing prospect in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-13-2014, 12:11 PM
  3. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 05:39 PM
  4. Sept 16th OMFG!!!
    By albsur2006 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 07:31 AM
  5. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-15-2006, 03:29 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing