Well i think The Rings ratings are the most accurate. What I don't like about all the sanctining bodies ratings(wbc,wbo,ibf,wba) is that they don't rate other sanction bodies champions which just doesn't make sense. How can Baldimor be the real champ but not even be in the ratings of the wbo,wba,ibf.I think the ring gives the best unbiased report of who the best fighters in the divison really are. I mean come on you know baldimor is champ so who would be his #1 contender? I think floyd. Not paul williams(wbo)mark suarez(ibf) or Oktay urkal(wba)
Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
I just want to know why you guys think they are so great? I was just checking out their rankings and they seem as bad as all the other organisations(forgive me if I'm missing something,I don't know much about them)

for WW,they have Zab Judah at number 3 despite having lost 4 of his last 7 fights,they have Urkal at 6,Gatti at 7 above Quintana,Julio,Williams etc. I could give more examples too,I meanw hat do they use to caculate their system??

Also,Margarito has been in the top 10 for 273 FOOOOOOKING WEEKS!! WTF does this man have to do to nail a shot at the big time!!
I think it makes sense. What welter besides baldimor,floyd, and margarito is better than zab. Who else would be favored to beat him? As far as quintana,julio,and williams goes, they are where they are because yes they look good in ring but they have done nothing. Quintanas best win is julio.Who? Julio has no good wins and williams best win was over a done mitchell. At least urkal has been in with tszyu and harris and gattis been in with the best he just can't beat the best.