Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 107

Thread: Miguel Cotto v Yoshihiro Kamegai

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,890
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2059
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    Quintana. You forgot Carlos Quintana. That was for another vacant championship. Jennings and Pinto only fought a handful of times between after Cotto ruined them. That's what happens when you fight Cotto for a vacant championship. He ruins you and you go on to only fight 1 or 2 more times. Quintana fought more than that, but he was never the same. Cotto ruined him also. Cotto found out early in his career that when you fight for a vacant title, somehow the opponent is lesser, weaker, more inferior than if you're fighting for an occupied title. It's a well-kept secret.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    721
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quintana. You forgot Carlos Quintana. That was for another vacant championship. Jennings and Pinto only fought a handful of times between after Cotto ruined them. That's what happens when you fight Cotto for a vacant championship. He ruins you and you go on to only fight 1 or 2 more times. Quintana fought more than that, but he was never the same. Cotto ruined him also. Cotto found out early in his career that when you fight for a vacant title, somehow the opponent is lesser, weaker, more inferior than if you're fighting for an occupied title. It's a well-kept secret.
    I didn't realize Quintana was a vacancy fight for, was it the WBA? My memory gets worse every year. I would say Quintana back then was a respectable opponent, worthy of calling it a championship fight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    711
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    If it's PPV then it's awful. It's not even really main event quality on HBO. It's an alright fight though. Kamegui isn't great but he comes to fight.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    587
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    A bit of a step back for Cotto really. Kamegai doesn't have the power to hurt Cotto or the finesse but he will be on Cotto the entire fight. Kamegai is fun and should give the inactive Puerto Rican a few rough moments but I see him losing a wide decision.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    67,007
    Mentioned
    1706 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3143
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quintana. You forgot Carlos Quintana. That was for another vacant championship. Jennings and Pinto only fought a handful of times between after Cotto ruined them. That's what happens when you fight Cotto for a vacant championship. He ruins you and you go on to only fight 1 or 2 more times. Quintana fought more than that, but he was never the same. Cotto ruined him also. Cotto found out early in his career that when you fight for a vacant title, somehow the opponent is lesser, weaker, more inferior than if you're fighting for an occupied title. It's a well-kept secret.
    You are right Jennings lost to Cotto, had a couple of wins and then lost to Kell Brook and promptly retired in 2010. I though Jenning was going to be a world champion.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    587
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    I heard through the rumor mill that Cotto/ Lemieux could be next.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,313
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5156
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto vs Kamegai Aug. 26

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quintana. You forgot Carlos Quintana. That was for another vacant championship. Jennings and Pinto only fought a handful of times between after Cotto ruined them. That's what happens when you fight Cotto for a vacant championship. He ruins you and you go on to only fight 1 or 2 more times. Quintana fought more than that, but he was never the same. Cotto ruined him also. Cotto found out early in his career that when you fight for a vacant title, somehow the opponent is lesser, weaker, more inferior than if you're fighting for an occupied title. It's a well-kept secret.
    Maybe a credit to both Cotto and Quintana but I wouldn't say he ruined a Quintana. Went on to pretty much school and undefeated "no one will fight me" Paul Williams. Well at least once . I'm also wondering if Cotto gets enough credit for doing what he did with a fresher Mosley who didn't exactly repeatedly light up the stage afterwards.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-11-2012, 10:04 PM
  2. Miguel Cotto, what if....
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 04-18-2009, 10:00 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-09-2008, 04:07 PM
  4. Miguel Cotto when he was a boy
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 08:32 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing