Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by luvfightgame
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by luvfightgame
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by bilbo
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
A literal interpretation of the bible? So you cant pick and choose your bits, right?

Personally i couldn't care less what people believe but please explain Noah's ark the 50,000 species of animal, 1 million species of insects....and the DINOSAURS all living together for over 6 months?
luvfightgame is correct, this is a question outside the realms of science.

There is no scientific evidence that can prove one way or the other specific details of a man building an ark.
You dont have to explain it

Noah's ark. million species. Dinosaurs.

Yes or no?
Noah's ark-yes
millions of species-not millions
dinosaurs- yes
It doesn't need a seperate thread

If you want to explain how this could of happened

i'm all ears
Ok,

It took approximately 120 years to build the ark.

It didn't require fish, insects, nor every variety of species. It only required 1 "kind" therefore a single dog breed would suffice. Same for each other "kind".

He took baby dinosaurs.
Oh of course, "kinds" and little baby dinosaurs, it makes sense now...Kent Hovind fan?

To believe that the ark story actually happened, you must really NEED to believe, for some reason



By the way Bilbo

Ica stones - http://skepdic.com/icastones.html
Hey Fenster,

Yes the authenticity of many of the Ica Stones has been hotly contested for several reasons.

The most eriosu accusation is fraud and indeed it is fair to suggest that many may be hoaxes. Unfortunately in both archaeology and paleontology there is a massive market for fossil and acrchaeological finds. Many finds are not discovered by experts themselves but by locals who then sell their finds.

It is fair to say that many of the more elaborate Ica Stones were faked in this way.

However this sort of deception problem is in now way limited to archaeological finds. Paleontologists have a similar problem with many fossils later proving to be hoaxes.

Within the last 10 years there was a major 'dino-bird' discovery named archaeoraptor that made headlines around the world. The National Geographic put it on the front page of their magazine announcing the missing link between dinosaurs and birds had been found!

It was a matter of mere months later that archeoraptor was discovered to actually be two fossils glued together, a great source of embarresment to the evolutionist community.

Unfortunately it is one of the pitfalls of working in such an area.

However the Mexican dinosaurs that I also included several pictures of have not had their authenticty challenged. Remarkably they seem to be genuine.