Horn decision makes me rethink boxing

**Ron Swanson** · 07-03-2017 03:48 PM

Originally Posted by Hulk

Originally Posted by palmerq

Originally Posted by Hulk

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Perhaps you get so frustrated because you don't actually understand what you are speaking about. For example that first round wasn't wrongly scored. The judge misinterpreted his options. It didn't have to be 10-6. The judge just didn't know it could be because most judges won't go to 10-6. So it wasn't scored wrong. It just could have been scored differently.Pac has benefitted from a couple bad decisions and been hurt by a couple. It evened out.

What gift decisions has Pacquaio benefited from?

i guess the 3rd marquez fight, i remember that one being very controversial, I didnt see it.. who did you have winning that one ?

Honestly, id have to go back and watch it as the 2nd n 3rd fights blend together for me. They all do really aside from the 1st round of the 1st fight and the KO in the 4th fight that encouraged Mayweather to fight Manny.

Pac won II, Marquez won III more clearly than Pac won II. 1 is debateable.

**powerpuncher** · 07-03-2017 06:54 PM

I had JMM winning the second fight by a point but it was really close so the decision wasn't a problem. The third fight was clearly JMM. It wasn't close.

**Ron Swanson** · 07-03-2017 07:34 PM

Originally Posted by powerpuncher

I had JMM winning the second fight by a point but it was really close so the decision wasn't a problem. The third fight was clearly JMM. It wasn't close.

I disagree about II, but that gets to the point, getting upset about close fights going the other way would have you pulling your hair out.

In the end this is all about PAC letting a B fighter keep it too close when his contract with Bob was short. He's been here before, he should know better.(although Bradley wasn't a B fighter)