Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  44
Dislikes Dislikes:  4
Results 1 to 15 of 111

Thread: Are the Beatles overrated?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Truth.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Anyone who dares ask this question should be shot. Just the fact that Lennon and McCartney met proves the existence of God. Their voices were meant to be together. Paul was a great bass player. Sgt pepper to this day is one of the greatest pieces of music ever written. I've been lucky enough to see McCartney and Richard starkey. The Beatles are like Mozart and Beethoven it will always be. I think some take these statements as an insult to music they like but it isn't. Know lock this thread and slap šŸ‘‹ master

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.
    Bob Dylan changed music. Like a rolling stone was ahead of it's time. Dude is the American Shakespeare

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.
    Bob Dylan changed music. Like a rolling stone was ahead of it's time. Dude is the American Shakespeare

    100% agree.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,326
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3108
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.
    Bob Dylan changed music. Like a rolling stone was ahead of it's time. Dude is the American Shakespeare

    100% agree.
    So there you have it, 1 band has been named.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    650
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.
    Bob Dylan changed music. Like a rolling stone was ahead of it's time. Dude is the American Shakespeare

    100% agree.
    So there you have it, 1 band has been named.
    Bob Dylan is not a band

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,139
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Name one other band that changed the world. Just one.

    Tricky one. They changed a world that Bill Haley/Elvis/the Blues artists etc had already ripened up for teenagers and revolution. Their key was a willingness to change adapt and move on and use people like Martin in realising a sound that was unique. Everyone after had big shoes to fill but hard to pretend these did not change the world

    The Sex Pistols/The Clash - Punk was much more than the music and represented a seachange in sensibility and approach and what The Clash did for Reggae alone changed many attitudes

    Run DMC /Grandmaster Flash - Hip Hop again liked punk changed everything from fashion to the acceptance of things like street art and again attitudes and language

    Black Sabbath/Led Zeppelin - No heavy metal or heavy rock scenes without these two giants and again culturally pushed the envelope and legitimized another kind of rebellion for millions

    Kraftwerk - It's easy to dismiss electronic Music as it is everywhere but no techno/trance/ambient/house music etc without these guys first

    James Brown - Again no Funk/Soul/Disco etc whole genres springing from the groundwork laid by him. Can you even imagine people like Jackson without him ?

    The Jimi Hendrix Experience - Huge impact for much more than guitar gods, Jazz/funk/rock/fusion bands started because of him and the whole counter cultural movement


    Pink Floyd - Again moving on things like recording technology and even influencing detractors like the Pistols to rebel against their prog/concept


    Nirvana/Sonic Youth - It gets hard this far down the line but again a sea change in approach and sound spawning many bands and an influence still heard today


    Duke Ellington/Count Basie

    The Beach Boys

    The Grateful dead

    Abba

    yes I did just say ABBA (check out harmonies, songwriting, astonishing attention to detail in recording)
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Where the sun is shining!
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    724
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    lol, don't we all live in a yellow submarine?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Where the sun is shining!
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    724
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    talk bout a head of time, written 83

    Well, my shoes, they come from Singapore
    My flashlight's from Taiwan
    My tablecloth's from Malaysia
    My belt buckle's from the Amazon
    You know, this shirt I wear comes from the Philippines
    And the car I drive is a Chevrolet
    It was put together down in Argentina
    By a guy making thirty cents a day

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,177
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1872
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    No

    The end

    Elvis was mind
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1075
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    I've never been a big Beatles fan at all, save for a few songs on the white album. However, I think that their impact and their influence over the musical scene is absolutely staggering!
    Last edited by Master; 08-18-2017 at 11:06 PM.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    I've never been a big Beatles fan at all, save for a few songs on the white album. However, I think that their impact and their influence over the musical scene is absolutely staggering!

    Could not have said it better. They may not have been the best band of all time. But every great band wants to be them. There influence is still being felt today.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    808
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    The Beatles may have been a bit overrated, since George Martin never got the credit he deserved for refining their music.

    But that being said, they were amazingly creative musicians. While many other bands did well for a year or two and then stopped being creative, the Beatles kept coming out with genuinely good music year after year, and continued doing so during their solo careers. Just when people said they were finished, they would bounce back with more good music.

    While other groups got stuck in the kind of pop the Beatles were doing in 1963-64 (bands like The Dave Clark Five, The Searchers, and Gerry and the Pacemakers), they evolved (with the help of George Martin) and their music kept on improving as they became more more musically sophisticated, with the Rubber Soul, Revolver and the Sgt Pepper's albums.

    I think John Lennon was mainly responsible for the Beatles early success, for example writing their first hit Please Please Me and writing the majority of songs on the Hard Day's Night album. He reached his musical prime around 1965 with songs like Ticket to Ride, Help, You're Going to Lose That Girl and the brilliant In My Life.

    From 1966 to 1968 Paul became the main Beatle as John became more interested in LSD and other things. Paul wrote 8 of their last 10 #1 singles, and most of the music on Sgt Peppers. Paul was still writing nice songs in the winter of 68-69 with Let It Be and Long Winding Road (both released as singles more than a year later) but his contributions to Abbey Road such as Maxwell's Silver Hammer and Oh Darling sucked (that being said, he put some nice bass on Something and Come Together).

    The best Beatles songs by mid-1969 (Abbey Road's Something and Here Comes the Sun) were from George Harrison, and the best solo album in 1970-1971 was from George (All Things Must Pass). Paul's first solo album was awful. John's Plastic One Band was much better, music critics at the time bashed Paul (calling him overrated) and praised John, and suggested that Paul couldn't write good songs without John. But John's subsequent albums had too many self-pity songs, and the critics and the public soon grew tired of his stuff (his Mind Games album was sickening). But then Lennon bounced back with a better album Walls and Bridges and a #1 single Whatever Get's You Through The Night.

    And Paul eventually came out with a great album Band on the Run which had several hit singles. A couple of years later, the number one song on Billboard for the year of 1976 was by Paul, Silly Love Songs. In in the fall of 1987, after not doing much for several years, George Harrison had a #1 single, I've Got My Mind Set On You.
    Last edited by Freedom; 02-23-2019 at 05:32 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are the Beatles overrated?

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
    The Beatles may have been a bit overrated, since George Martin never got the credit he deserved for refining their music.

    But that being said, they were amazingly creative musicians. While many other bands did well for a year or two and then stopped being creative, the Beatles kept coming out with genuinely good music year after year, and continued doing so during their solo careers. Just when people said they were finished, they would bounce back with more good music.

    While other groups got stuck in the kind of pop the Beatles were doing in 1963-64 (bands like The Dave Clark Five, The Searchers, and Gerry and the Pacemakers), they evolved (with the help of George Martin) and their music kept on improving as they became more more musically sophisticated, with Rubber Soul, Revolver and the Sgt Pepper's album.

    I think John Lennon was mainly responsible for the Beatles early success, for example writing their first hit Please Please Me and writing the majority of songs on the Hard Day's Night album. He reached his musical prime around 1965 with songs like Ticket to Ride, Help, You're Going to Lose That Girl and the brilliant In My Life.

    From 1966 to 1968 Paul became the main Beatle as John became more interested in LSD and other things. Paul wrote 8 of their last 10 #1 singles, and the majority of the music on Sgt Peppers. Paul was still writing nice songs in the winter of 68-69 with Let It Be and Long Winding Road (both released as singles more than a year later) but his contributions to Abbey Road such as Maxwell's Silver Hammer and Oh Darling sucked (that being said, he put some nice bass on Something and Come Together)

    The best Beatles songs by mid-1969 (Abbey Road's Something and Here Comes the Sun) were from George Harrison, and the best solo album in 1970-1971 was from George (All Things Must Pass). Paul's first solo album was awful. John's Plastic One Band was much better, music critics at the time bashed Paul (calling him overrated) and praised John, and suggested that Paul couldn't write good songs without John. But John's subsequent albums had too many self-pity songs, and the critics and the public soon grew tired of his stuff (his Mind Games album was sickening). But then Lennon bounced back with a better album Walls and Bridges and a #1 single Whatever Get's You Through The Night.

    And Paul eventually came out with a great album Band on the Run which had several hit singles. A couple of years later, the number one song on Billboard for the year of 1976 was by Paul, Silly Love Songs. In in the fall of 1987, after not doing much for several years, George Harrison had a #1 single, I've Got My Mind Set On You.
    Beatles may have been a bit overrated. George Martin was producing commercials and odds and ends prior to the Beatles. I’m not minimizing Martin, he was the fifth Beatles, but he did not make the Beatles. Sorry freedom I now have to ask for u to be banned as well. Martin was a Beatle, he did not make the Beatles. Let it Be was a fine album and Martin was not involved in it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What is the best Beatles song?
    By Gandalf in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-21-2018, 09:30 AM
  2. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-13-2010, 10:16 AM
  3. Beatles or Stones?
    By mrbig1 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 07:51 AM
  4. BEATLES FANS - CHECK DIS OUT!!!
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 04:44 AM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:14 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing