Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo ESPN

[Fenster]

Indongo, who is only getting this fight because he burgled two trinkets, wasn't even known a year ago, most fans have never seen him fight (just read the comments on here) yet are all excited/hyped because four silly belts are on the line.

Lets get this right - Indongo is a far bigger betting outsider than McGregor to beat Floyd. The silly Floyd mismatch is considered more competitive than the super duper shiny belts fight.

Indongo didn't look like a P4P world-conqueror beating a virtual "shot" Burns. He's a tall bloke with a rinse and repeat left hand that showed a good engine in a fight he was allowed to dominate and control.

Crawford KO within 6. (7/2)

So you big up Marriaga who has 0 good wins, is 0-3 in title fights for a fight moving up in weight. But steal the shine off a guy who is trying to do what has only been done once since the 80's and is fighting in his division. The division he has won 2 titles in traveling to his opponents home towns. Interesting completely backwards perspective.

I agree that Crawford wins though, just not within 6.

I never "bigged up" Marriaga.

My point is about FANS not fighters, there's no criticism or "shine stealing" going on.

If you understood my points you would realise the Marriaga situation is perfectly consistent with this. Belts dazzle your wide eyes but the substance behind them is all that matters. Marriaga is a better opponent than Indongo.

You said he "burgled" and said he "was allowed to dominate". If you don't realizing that is stealing shine, you know what. You are clearly being deceptive again. It's your thing, I get it.

Suggesting I am about belts is just more of your deception. I constantly talk about fights. Fights.

You are the one that leads people, like calling Mijey a 140 fighter when he was at 130 just a couple fights ago. He isn't a 140 fight and you know it. But, again, leading, deceiving. Read your own words. You want to not steal shine, perhaps don't say guys burgled or were allowed. Just say he kicked their asses. Like what happened, not what you want people to see.

So because you don't understand me I have to change the way I post? Behave. I am not American, i'll speak however I like.

I decieve people? No, you're paranoid. And you just admitted you don't even know what I mean half the time.

"Burgled" is a COMPLIMENT!!! It's merely colourful lexicon, instead of blandly writing "Indongo twice won belts away from home." A "shot" Burns wasn't able to do anything about being dominated ("shot" implies a non-shot Burns would have done much better). I was making a case for why Crawford would win EASY, why Crawford was worth betting on by early KO! How do you expect someone to make a case for a betting angle without offering reasons? I said similar things about Indongo before he faced Burns.

Garica fought Broner at what weight? 140!!! Garcia is currently RING ranked in what division? 140!!! How the funk is telling the TRUTH deceptive? Stop with the nonsense.