Nathan Cleverly-Badou Jack - Excellent fight! (Floyd undercard).

**Ron Swanson** · 08-29-2017 02:56 AM

Originally Posted by Fenster

Even though Cleverly is a shadow, this current version of Jack would have battered him at any time regardless. It's incredible watching Jack improve so greatly, become so much faster, stronger and sharper as he gets older. They've got some good training "methods" in the Mayweather gym.

Cleverly was winded in the opening minute(s) which totally drained his confidence and output.

Jack-Kovalev would be some punchup.

Did you go from American judges would screw him to PEDs to taunt me or are you just incapable of saying X beat Ys arse?

**palmerq** · 08-29-2017 06:43 PM

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2017/08/...cks-challenge/

would be interesting

**powerpuncher** · 08-29-2017 07:52 PM

Originally Posted by palmerq

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2017/08/...cks-challenge/

would be interesting

A weird fight for Stevenson. I feel like it really isn't a cash out fight which is weird. Stevenson has been fighting bums for the past however many years and I assumed that he would take a big fight to cash out like with Kovalev or Ward. Jack is a very loseable fight. I doubt Stevenson takes it.

**Fenster** · 08-29-2017 07:40 PM

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson

Originally Posted by Fenster

Even though Cleverly is a shadow, this current version of Jack would have battered him at any time regardless. It's incredible watching Jack improve so greatly, become so much faster, stronger and sharper as he gets older. They've got some good training "methods" in the Mayweather gym.

Cleverly was winded in the opening minute(s) which totally drained his confidence and output.

Jack-Kovalev would be some punchup.

Did you go from American judges would screw him to PEDs to taunt me or are you just incapable of saying X beat Ys arse?

I never said anything about "American judges" screwing Clev, you have me mixed up with someone else mate

And i'm certainly not taunting you. Why? No disrespect but why would I possibly have you on my mind? There are loads of regular posters on this forum offering a variety of opinions on a smorgasbord of topics, there's been over a dozen posters partake in this very thread alone. I would have named or quoted you if directly addressing something you've said.

PEDs? I've seen/heard people that apparently "know" about these things accuse him. I'd rather believe his improvement is down to good old hard work and dedication though, innocent until proven guilty.