North Korea launches an ICBM over Japan, and ***NEEDS 2 B NUKED***

[brocktonblockbust]

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/j...233136310.html

[TitoFan]

I'll be Miles on this argument.


Kim Jong-un is a respectable world leader and his poor country is tired of getting picked on. He is justified in lobbing missiles over Japan because..... well..... because..... well just because he is. (I suck at this). It's all the U.S.'s fault because of their bad history that has led North Korea to do this kind of thing. North Korea really doesn't mean anything by it.... they're just kidding. They're just mad because the U.S. refuses to treat them like a fellow world power, and they don't want to be relegated to talking with the small potatoes, like South Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc. They're a world power, damn it!! And they demand respect. R-E-S-P-E-C-T...... like Aretha Franklin would say. So leave Kim Jong-un alone, Brock. The U.S. is evil.


How was that?

[brocktonblockbust]

I'll be Miles on this argument.


Kim Jong-un is a respectable world leader and his poor country is tired of getting picked on. He is justified in lobbing missiles over Japan because..... well..... because..... well just because he is. (I suck at this). It's all the U.S.'s fault because of their bad history that has led North Korea to do this kind of thing. North Korea really doesn't mean anything by it.... they're just kidding. They're just mad because the U.S. refuses to treat them like a fellow world power, and they don't want to be relegated to talking with the small potatoes, like South Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc. They're a world power, damn it!! And they demand respect. R-E-S-P-E-C-T...... like Aretha Franklin would say. So leave Kim Jong-un alone, Brock. The U.S. is evil.


How was that?

I cant think of anything you left out, wait......... .................. er, umm.................................. oh yeah .....................

[Gandalf]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

[brocktonblockbust]

It was not launched into the sea. Hahaha way to spin it like it is nothing an intercontinental ballistic missile was launched directly over and through the airspace of Japan. Do you understand that?

[brocktonblockbust]

Tito there is a Madman on this floor of who is comparing Yemen to Japan. You just can't make this stuff up

[Beanz]

http://newsthump.com/2017/08/29/firi...d-japan-twice/

[brocktonblockbust]

Tito there is a Madman on this floor of who is comparing Yemen to Japan. You just can't make this stuff up

And another madman pitting 2 atom bombs against NK Missiles as if there's a connection

[TitoFan]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

[TitoFan]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

Just for grins.

[walrus]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

[Gandalf]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

Notice how Tito seems to have no concern about actual bombs used on actual people. Cognitive dissonance at work there.

[TitoFan]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

I have voted for him for FGOTY unfailingly. Doesn't that balance out how I mistreat him on Korea?

[Gandalf]

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

So Fenster hurt your feelings too by liking my post, eh? It's a tough world for sure.

Also, nobody is 'defending' anyone you nitwit. All that is happening is that hypocrisy and double standards are being pointed out. First you said I was being outlandish by saying the 1994 deal was broken by the US and then I hear this constant talk about defending North Korea as a result. It is beyond lame. I think you must have serious problems with comprehension as these things are not happening. I despise North Korea almost as much as I despise flamenco, but do carry on. What I will point out though is that your country has just been testing nuclear bombs and I hear nary a squeak from you about that, but of course you have a lot to say about the menace of North Korea. I mean after all, we know that being a centrist you get all of your information from CNN and thus you probably have zero idea that your country has been testing nuclear bombs. You certainly do not care that bombs are being dropped on Yemen right now and you do not care about nuclear testing, but you are very concerned with North Korea. I get it, you are very nuanced and clearly very informed.

As for the rest of your absurd little rant, all I see is a lot of pent up pain. My position is a balanced one argued with logic and reason. Yours is just a bizarre rant. What kind of 'bizarre loyalty that makes little sense are you talking about'? Erm, the kind of loyalty that would like the region not to be destroyed and urged on by ignorant people like yourself? The loyalty of looking at an issue from both sides rather than just look at it from the position of power? You make absolutely zero sense, you clearly have no idea what you are on about. The very fact that you keep saying I am defending North Korea shows how you just cannot even comprehend how I think. You are too blinkered and blinded by preconceived opinions and notions that you just frankly sound odd.

If you would like to discuss an issue I am able to do that, but otherwise you are just annoying. If you haven't noticed, I will have my opinion and disagree with every single person on this forum if need be. However, I will always try to back up what I say with evidence. On this issue, too many of you lack balance.