North Korea launches an ICBM over Japan, and ***NEEDS 2 B NUKED***

[brocktonblockbust]

@Gandalf nice sleight of hand there, fudging my "need 2 b nuked" and trying to slide it into "genocide" FFS WHAT THE FUCK DOES NUKE HAVE TO DO WITH GENOCIDE

[Gandalf]

Tito, you have failed to accept the points I have made prefering to constantly resort to ad hominem and points not connected to the topic.

Do I dislike aspects of US foreign policy? Of course. Do I dislike the system of NK? Of course. Do I think war is a crazy and dangerous thing? Of course.

Your use of the word 'us' is fairly revealing. You are finally admitting that you are in a little club. I have proven that I am not thus contradicting that particular claim. You won't see me becoming a Nazi.

[TitoFan]

Do I dislike aspects of US foreign policy? Of course. Do I dislike the system of NK? Of course.

It's typical of one who's being defeated in an argument to slowly backtrack from his positions, and make it look like he was a moderate the whole time.





This tactic is as transparent as plate glass.

I should probably let you off the hook and let the argument die a slow death. Let you slink off with some dignity.

Ok, I'll consider it......... but only 'cause I'm a nice guy.

[Gandalf]

Disagreeing with the endless wars is a moderate position, Tito. Arguing for nuclear war is what most would call an extreme position. Maybe it is different over there but global opinion has been against what has been happening in all too many countries. What has happened over the years is really that more people agree that Iraq was wrong, that relationships in the Middle East are hypocritical, etc. It is one reason Corbyn is so popular. My views have become merged with a general consensus.Yes, I am a bit more moderate, but ordinary people around the world are on the same page too. Talk to people, you don't find many saying 'Let's nuke them' but you see many saying 'Let's find a way deal with this peacefully'.

[TitoFan]

I've never said "let's nuke them", just in case you've become confused on that point. All I've done is include NK and Kim Jong-un in my criticism, and for some reason, you've seemed to have taken offense to that.

Let's get serious here.

I've been one of the biggest Trump critics here, and you know that. I've clearly stated that the U.S. does not belong in every single solitary global conflict... and you know that. I've never called for NK (or any other country for that matter) to be nuked, and you know that.

But all I do is criticize NK and Kim Jong-un..... and you go into defense mode. I blasted Jong-un for threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska..... and you tried to justify it by bringing up where the U.S. had failed to come through with past agreements with NK. As if any of that warranted nuclear threats from NK. Then you brush it off by saying NK is just kidding. Really? Finally, you desperately start bringing up past U.S. transgressions like their nuclear bombing of Japan. But no..... you've never defended North Korea.

In any debate or court of law, you would've long been laughed off the stage or courtroom...... and you know it.

So you'll get a free pass from your buddies, but not from me. I'm dead serious when I discuss these issues, because they're issues that have a potential effect on all of us. Just because there's an egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading the United States right now, it doesn't mean I can't criticize the egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading North Korea as well.

[brocktonblockbust]

I've been one of the biggest Trump critics here, and you know that.

Oh please youve been kissing the Orange Chimpanzee's chubby ass since the election, dont try to spin it now

[Beanz]

I've never said "let's nuke them", just in case you've become confused on that point. All I've done is include NK and Kim Jong-un in my criticism, and for some reason, you've seemed to have taken offense to that.

Let's get serious here.

I've been one of the biggest Trump critics here, and you know that. I've clearly stated that the U.S. does not belong in every single solitary global conflict... and you know that. I've never called for NK (or any other country for that matter) to be nuked, and you know that.

But all I do is criticize NK and Kim Jong-un..... and you go into defense mode. I blasted Jong-un for threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska..... and you tried to justify it by bringing up where the U.S. had failed to come through with past agreements with NK. As if any of that warranted nuclear threats from NK. Then you brush it off by saying NK is just kidding. Really? Finally, you desperately start bringing up past U.S. transgressions like their nuclear bombing of Japan. But no..... you've never defended North Korea.

In any debate or court of law, you would've long been laughed off the stage or courtroom...... and you know it.

So you'll get a free pass from your buddies, but not from me. I'm dead serious when I discuss these issues, because they're issues that have a potential effect on all of us. Just because there's an egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading the United States right now, it doesn't mean I can't criticize the egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading North Korea as well.

Do you really think someone living where Miles is would be anything less than serious ? Give the guy some credit. I am sure he does not want to be collateral damage even though Brock would not give a flying fuck as long as he won the argument.

[brocktonblockbust]

I've never said "let's nuke them", just in case you've become confused on that point. All I've done is include NK and Kim Jong-un in my criticism, and for some reason, you've seemed to have taken offense to that.

Let's get serious here.

I've been one of the biggest Trump critics here, and you know that. I've clearly stated that the U.S. does not belong in every single solitary global conflict... and you know that. I've never called for NK (or any other country for that matter) to be nuked, and you know that.

But all I do is criticize NK and Kim Jong-un..... and you go into defense mode. I blasted Jong-un for threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska..... and you tried to justify it by bringing up where the U.S. had failed to come through with past agreements with NK. As if any of that warranted nuclear threats from NK. Then you brush it off by saying NK is just kidding. Really? Finally, you desperately start bringing up past U.S. transgressions like their nuclear bombing of Japan. But no..... you've never defended North Korea.

In any debate or court of law, you would've long been laughed off the stage or courtroom...... and you know it.

So you'll get a free pass from your buddies, but not from me. I'm dead serious when I discuss these issues, because they're issues that have a potential effect on all of us. Just because there's an egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading the United States right now, it doesn't mean I can't criticize the egotistical, emotionally-unstable dumbass leading North Korea as well.

Do you really think someone living where Miles is would be anything less than serious ? Give the guy some credit. I am sure he does not want to be collateral damage even though Brock would not give a flying fuck as long as he won the argument.

REEEEET .......................how fucking dare you with that gall! I have altruistically IMPLORED --- BESEECHED --- @Gandalf to *********GET THE FUCK OUT AND TAKE A 2 MONTH SABBATICAL******** in order to save his zoned-out ******CANDLE-ZOMBIE****** ass. Quite the contrary, Beanz FFS